Apparently fewer and fewer. The point of the article is that fewer women are raising the next generation. (On a related note, having children to take care of you in your old age is damn selfish and completely dehumanizing to those children).
...and won't even care who you are.
Not like they ever did. That's one point the article intentionally redirects away from. Men have awaken to the truth that women don't care about men. Women aren't innocent bystanders in this. They've voted for it and actively support it. They pretended they cared but once social media took off, women couldn't help themselves but go online and expose their callousness, indifference, and outright contributions.
Feminism didn't free women from the oppression they were told they were under, it freed men from the oppression they didn't know they were under.
Whose problem will that be?
Women's. It's already their problem. As the article points out, men are opting out.
Yes, but a higher percentage than ever is raising them alone. When those kids are old enough to vote and are running the country, who do you think they are going to favor when it comes time to hand out the benefits? The mothers who raised them, or you?
(On a related note, having children to take care of you in your old age is damn selfish and completely dehumanizing to those children).
Maybe so, but that doesn't refute the economics of it.
Feminism didn't free women from the oppression they were told they were under, it freed men from the oppression they didn't know they were under.
Based on your post #16, that porn activism doesn't appear to be working too well.
Women's. It's already their problem. As the article points out, men are opting out.
That reply doesn't address the issue you're replying to, which is that future generations raised by women won't care about men. Whose problem will that be?