Replies

How Federal Transfers Undermine Freedom

https://aier.org/article/how-federal-transfers-undermine-freedom/

Excerpt:

.....examining the relationship between federal, state, and local governments shaped by transfers and the incentives they create. Transfers enable the federal government to exert influence over state and local policy beyond what direct legislation — or indeed the Constitution — allows.

.....parameters of “competitive, ‘market preserving’ federalism,” which emphasize:

State governments underneath a central government have sufficient authority and independence to compete with other states over “some range” of political and economic policies.

States control what happens within their borders, but the central government ensures people and goods can move freely between states to avoid “excessive externalities.”

Transfer payments from the central government to the states are extremely limited.

Today, the US falls short of this model. It suffers from what Greve calls “cartel federalism,” in which the federal and state governments act as “partners in a collective enterprise.” This partnership gives the federal government influence over state and local affairs by using “the production and distribution of rents among politicians, bureaucrats, and concentrated industry sectors.” In return, it softens state and local budget constraints with infusions of federal funds. The result is more centralization and less accountability.

.....Despite the clear failings of federal aid, federal policymakers are eager to dole it out and state and local policymakers are eager to accept. The feedback loop reinforces administrative centralization and detracts from individual liberty.

.....in the Supreme Court case South Dakota v. Dole (1987), in which the Supreme Court ruled that Congress may attach conditions to federal funds to influence state policy so long as these conditions promote the “general welfare,” are clearly stated, and are not coercive. In this case, the Court upheld a reduction in highway funding for states that refused to raise the drinking age, calling it “relatively mild encouragement.”

.....In practice, the Dole framework grants Congress broad latitude to shape state policy indirectly through funding. This issue was revisited in NFIB v. Sebelius (2012), where the Court ruled that threatening states with the loss of all Medicaid funding crossed into coercion. This ruling was narrow and preserved the broader logic of Dole, leaving most conditional funding programs intact.

What appears cooperative is often a system of negotiated dependence, where constitutional doctrine and fiscal incentives work together to shift authority toward the federal government and away from the states.

.....When federal aid comes into the picture, decision-making becomes distorted. Federal transfers allow states to export some of their burden of funding their own budgets to taxpayers across the country. The cost of spending a dollar is now much less than a dollar for state taxpayers. As a result, states will overspend on federally subsidized activities (especially those that support interest groups) and underspend on other budget priorities, regardless of how state residents value that spending.

.....The goal of increasing spending to maximize federal dollars also invites a lapse in program security, inviting fraud and abuse. At the beginning of 2026, the federal Department of Health and Human Services froze childcare and family assistance in five states over fraud concerns.

Jonathan Rodden’s analysis of fiscal federalism finds that this is a predictable outcome of institutional design. Rodden finds that when subnational governments depend on transfers while retaining borrowing and spending autonomy, they can expand programs without fully bearing the cost, also known as a “soft budget constraint.”

Political incentives reinforce this behavior. Policymakers respond to the fiscal rules they operate under as actors that want to maximize resources and avoid hard tradeoffs. When spending decisions are made locally but financed nationally, each state will try to draw as much as possible from federal funds while spreading the costs across the national tax base.

The result is a system that quietly builds fiscal distress beneath a veneer of stability.

.....Additionally, state policymakers can begin tracking the number and type of federal transfers coming into the state. Recently, Indiana Comptroller Elise Nieshalla began a campaign highlighting how excessive national debt comes from overspending, which has drawn many state legislators and organizations to rally to the cause. Comptroller Nieshalla has also highlighted the dangers in her own state with a data transparency portal, noting that 43.48 percent of Indiana state expenses were paid from federal transfers.

.....The growth of federal transfers pushes America further from the ideal federalism rooted in competition and autonomy and emboldens a federalism defined by dependence and centralized control. What began as limited fiscal assistance evolved into a powerful mechanism through which the federal government shapes state and local policy, distorts local priorities, and weakens accountability. As fiscal pressures mount in DC, states face a critical choice: continue down the path of dependency or restore their fiscal independence. Reclaiming autonomy and preserving the decentralized system Tocqueville admired starts with ending the dependence on the federal government.

Developers are bullish on Florida’s future:

Avalon Park road plans start to take shape in Daytona

https://www.hometownnewsvolusia.com/news/avalon-park-road-plans-start-to-take-shape-in-daytona/article_848c1d6c-8599-11ef-bcfd-6be951cf001d.html

Excerpt:

.....Avalon Park, located a mile west of I-95 along the south side of State Road 40/West Granada Boulevard, is a long-term project with long-range transportation plans. It’s being constructed in four phases, with each phase expected to take about five years for completion.

Construction of the first phase is expected to begin sometime in 2025 and includes 2,032 residential units and 90,000 square feet of commercial space, according to the agreements. At full buildout, the project is expected to include 7,878 residential units and 1 million square feet of mixed-use space, defined as office, commercial and school uses.

The road infrastructure will be built in phases in line with each phase of the development. The timing of construction of the bridges will be contingent on when the county gets funding.
******************************

Couple this development with Palmer Ranch East in Sarasota County and the potential is for 14,000 new homes to be built in Florida over the next 10-20 years in just these two developments. Add to it a 400+ home development Pulte and DR Horton are building in South Daytona and builders are bullish on Florida. These developments don’t include South Florida or the Panhandle beaches which are booming.