[WinstonSmith1984]

People who think we landed on the moon and filmed it are the same people who think Building 7 killed itself.

I believed both a few years ago... so don’t take it personal buttercup.

[piytar]

Anyone who believes we didn’t actually land on the moon has the science acumen of roadkill.

[ChuckHam]

I bet you believe the earth is flat, too.

[LukeL]

I find it odd that in the 53 years since Apollo 17 man has only traveled 0.1% of the distance to the Moon. Add to that that no rover missions to the moon have occurred. We have not tried to study the lunar craters. caves. poles etc. We have not drilled into the moon and tried to bring back samples. We have not set up a satellite array so we can explore the far side of the moon as well. All of these would be far cheaper than exploring Mars.

We can also talk about the fact that virtually every photo from NASA is enhanced in someway. I understand why they do this, but this is not a true representation of what the objects really look like. This would be like doing a CT scan of your heart and then turning that into a color image.

[central_va]

Seek mental help.

[Seruzawa]

A group of incredibly brave men rode the fire into the sky and put humanity onto the moon. All you do is dishonor their courage and memory. GFY.

[Raycpa]

Even though we have a government that can’t do anything right and screws up everything it does or touches in this one event of landing several different missions on the moon each fake one was done so perfectly that no one could ever know they were being Hoodwinked in real time. Never ever underestimate our government.

[central_va]

I think the D-Day landings were fake. Normandy Shmomandy.

[farmguy]

“... buttercup”?

Isn’t that kinda snarky?

[Republican Wildcat]

People who think we landed on the moon and filmed it are the same people who think Building 7 killed itself.

Landing on the moon is a historical fact. Actually occurred more than once, not just with Apollo 11. It is embarrassing to suggest otherwise.

Building 7 fell because it was on fire for many hours - when a building in on fire for several hours, its structure continually weakens until it collapses. That is simple physics. The building was clearly ablaze for a very long period of time, so it would have been redundant to have done something several hours later to cause what was going to happen at that time anyway. It is embarrassing to suggest otherwise.

[JimRed]

Building 7 had catastrophic damage which resulted in its collapse. Prove me wrong.

[rxh4n1]

“People who think we landed on the moon and filmed it are the same people who think Building 7 killed itself.”

The Building 7 lie is part of the kook conspiracy theory that Mossad blew up the WTC from the inside. Supposedly, the Jewish employees in the WTC knew it was coming and didn’t show up for work that day. Hence “Some people did something”. Code for the JOOOOS did it. My compny had it’s HQ in the North Tower so I know personally that is a damned lie. Half the fatalities from our company were Jewish employees. I happened to know all of them. You can put your kook theory up where the sun doesn’t shine.

[cherry]

Oh the things I used to believe could fill a filing cabinet...sadder but wiser..