Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Melian

1,747 posted on 01/07/2026 6:15:22 PM PST by numberonepal (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1745 | View Replies ]


To: numberonepal
This would be the greatest checkmate move in history.

Nationalize the Minnesota Guard, recall Tim Walz to duty, and put him on crowd control right where these leftist freaks he has empowered can see him. And if he won’t follow orders— court martial.— malmesburyman (@malmesburyman) January 7, 2026


1,756 posted on 01/07/2026 6:47:41 PM PST by numberonepal (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1747 | View Replies ]

To: numberonepal

Or the regular military.

Sec. 332. Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority
Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or
assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable
to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial
proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use
such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress
the rebellion.

This is my favorite section:

Sec. 333. Interference with State and Federal law
The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means,
shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any
insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—

(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States
within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege,
immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the
constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right,
privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes
the course of justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the
equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.


1,768 posted on 01/07/2026 7:14:06 PM PST by little jeremiah (SCARE: Social Chaos And Response Emergency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1747 | View Replies ]

To: numberonepal

Cool...that’s the ghost that patrols my driveway.


1,864 posted on 01/08/2026 2:55:29 AM PST by RS_Rider (I hate Illinois Nazis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1747 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson