“the richest church on the planet is too cheap to spend her money”
It’s hinky to me that churches are even referred to in the perspective of wealth. I do know that’s a thing, but churches shouldn’t be wealthy when Job One is to bring people to Christ.
Still, it’s notable that “the richest church on the planet” began life as a revenue-generating scheme. So, right or wrong, it makes sense that wealth is a factor. And that denomination spends more money helping perverts and illegals who hate America than they do bringing people to Christ.
Thank you - please see my post to NorthMountain - his post (43) called me a liar - so I rejoined with my response (52 of the thread).