I have offered no perspective on it. Actually you, not I, are the one who is offering your own perspective.
I’m just trying to ascertain from the gathered Wise Ones what it was the Carlson was attempting to describe? Why not just speak plainly?
Both Jesus and Charlie were murdered for telling the truth to a discomfited establishment that in the first case stood, and in the current case, stands, to lose a lot from the revealed gospel.
Why didn’t Carlson simply say that?
Nutcases like you will accept no answer unless it agrees with your preconcevied delusions. Shut the f up