Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 09/01/2025 Vol.511, Q Day 2866

Corrections and further additions after break.

George Soros had a hand pressing down on the scales of US Presidential elections since Reagan. Soros directed Barack Obama to start the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. Obama's investigation of candidate Trump included (Soros controlled) Clinton Foundation/DNC to create the dossier used to obtain FISA's and spy on President Trump).
Soros controlled the DNC leadership (and some Rhinos). Out of curiousity, I looked for historical signs of Soros taking control of the DNC. When Mondale lost to Reagan (first term), Mondale spearheaded the creation of Democrat party 'superdelegates', awarding them extra influence in the selection of the DNC nominee (their votes 'count' more). I speculate that was when Soros took full control of the DNC, although an AI is not aware of Mondale ever meeting Soros.
Superdelegates in the Democratic National Committee (DNC) include all sitting Democratic governors, senators, and representatives, as well as distinguished party leaders such as current and former presidents and vice presidents, and members of the DNC itself. These individuals are automatically granted delegate status at the national convention.
Soros used Schumer to create mail-in voting for the purpose of improving control over election outcomes, to prevent Donald Trump from gaining a second term.
George Soros directed Barack Obama to start Crossfire Hurricane in order to remove candidate, and then President Trump. 3869

February 16, 2020, Alan Deshowitz said he had possession of the 302 form (standard FBI form used to memorialize witness statements) proving Barack Obama ordered the FBI to investigate someone on behalf of George Soros.
Rumble video of Dershowitz
Grok assembled a transcript of Dershowitz's comments from contemporaneous sources like Brietbart:
Alan Dershowitz: George Soros Asked Barack Obama to Investigate Undisclosed Person
TRANSCRIPT (ransomnote: I trimmed channel introduction etc. from the transcript Grok found on Breitbart. I made corrections to transcript errors and filled in comments missing from Breitbart's excerpt with additional video content in a Rumble video)

Dershowitz: "There was a
lot of Whitehouse control of the Justice
Department during the Kennedy
administration and I don't think we saw
very many liberal professors arguing
against that. I have some information as
well about the about the Obama
administration which will be disclosed
in a lawsuit at some point, but I'm not
prepared to disclose it now, about how
President Obama personally asked the FBI
to investigate somebody on behalf of
George Soros, who was a close ally

SNIP
We've seen this kind of White
House influence on the Justice
Department virtually in every Justice
Department. The difference is this
president (ransomnote: Trump) is much more overt about it. He
tweets about it.
President Obama whispered to the Justice
Department about it and and and I don't
think these thousand former Justice
Department officials would pass the shoe
on the other foot test. Maybe some of
them would but a good many of them
wouldn't, and let's be very clear about
the constitutionality. The president
could make a decision to really control
the Justice Department; he could decide
who to prosecute or not to prosecute. He
shouldn't do it; it hasn't been done
since Thomas Jefferson Thomas Jefferson
did do it. We've seen this throughout our
history.

[ransomnote: The interviewer asks for confirmation that Dershowitz said that George Soros asked Barack Obama to have his FBI department investigates somebody]

Dershowitz: Where that's going to come out, is in the
lawsuit in the near future. Yeah that is
not unusual. People whisper to presidents
all the time.
Presidents whisper to Justice Department
all the time. It's very common. It's wrong
whoever does it, but it's common and we
shouldn't think that it's unique to any
particular president.
I have in my
possession the actual 302 form which
documents this issue and it will, at the
right time, come out but I'm not free to
disclose it now because it's a case
that's not yet been filed.
[ransomnote: the Brietbart commentator said Dershowitz reflected on his experience at the impeachment trial of President Trump. He said his argument had been so grotesquely distorted by CNN that he could, if he wanted, sue the CNN network.
Rumble video
@ 25 sec
(Tucker Carlson) Dershowitz said Obama personally launched a politically motivated investigation after George Soros, a close ally of his, demanded he do so. Dershowitz said he can prove it.
@1:37 min/sec
The reporter says this comment occurred in the wake of AG Barr openly asking Trump to stop tweeting about ongoing Justice Department matters. Barr also said Trump never personally intervened in a Justice Department matter.
@1:50 min/sec
A left wing group organized about 1000 former DOJ officials to issue a letter demanding Barr's resignation (ransomnote: *sigh* Doesn't this mean those thousand former DOJ officials were controlled by Soros too? Or is it just a montage of China, Soros and others in the Cabal 'running' the US?) The WAPO slammed Bill Barr for functioning as President Trump's 'wingman' even though Eric Holder publicly identified himself as Obama's 'wingman'.
@2:44 min/sec
January 3, 2019, Dershowitz was introduced and mention is made of his book (i.e., The Case Against Impeaching Trump Hardcover – July 9, 2018)
@3:02 min/sec Dershowitz is asked what happened in Florida with the case against Jeffrey Epstein, noting that he was Epstein's attorney (ransomnote: She implied he's tarnished?)
@3:34 min/sec Dershowitz is asked about the accusations of his involvement with underage girls.
Dershowitz explains those accusations were totally made up. He said the first 'victim's' lawyer admitted in front of witnesses, that she was wrong, that Dershowitz couldn't have been in the places
He said the second victim wrote to the New York Post claiming she had videotapes of Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Donald Trump having sex with underage girls. The New York Post didn't believe her and refused to publish her story.
Dershowitz says stories like these all came from the same source, David Boies, who was angry with him for filing unethical bar charges against him (ransomnote: Unethical bar charges refer to fees or billing practices by attorneys that violate professional conduct rules)
He notes that women in the #MeToo movement all knew the men involved, whereas he had never met the women accusing him, never met them. He was looking for an opportunity to take the to court for a trial.
He discovered private emails which prove that he was framed, and identified the person framing him. He said the email(s) name names and that those people were going to go to jail. He asked the reporters to have him back on the show when the emails come out because there will be prominent people in handcuffs.
Q3969 indicates Durham's investigation of Crossfire Hurricane began in May of 2019 (when Barr appointed him). John Solomon said in April 2020 that he knew people whom Durham had subpoenaed to testify in Grand Jury hearings. The drop notes that Durham 'held' or froze declas because he had Grand Jury criminal case(s) ongoing (i.e., Grand Jury case materials have to be secured until the jury completes its work).
Solomon speculated that Durham would probably start with Kevin Clinesmith, who altered documents submitted to the FISA court. Foreign sources provided the Clinton Foundation/DNC dossier to support the FISA, and other non FISA intel.
But Durham wasn't the first to investigate Crossfire Hurricane House and Senate Oversight committees, Nunes; Grassley and other in Congress; had also been investigating and submitting referrals to the DOJ since 2016). Sessions then appointed John Huber, and Huber's appointment was confirmed August 3, 2017. (ransomnote: Huber's appointment began 2015; I wonder if it's possible he was activated from the start).
Noting for later, Whitaker Drops for his role in this puzzle.
4196
May 10, 2020

3177
3036

followup on
4845
4196

First drop with [gs] 'caged'
3590

From the Fox News article, "In his testimony, Baker said of McCabe’s state of mind when Comey was fired: “At this point in time, Andy was unbelievably focused and unbelievably confident and squared away. I don’t know how to describe it other than I was extremely proud to be around him at that point in time because I thought he was doing an excellent job at maintaining focus and dealing with a very uncertain and difficult situation.
ransomnote: I think McCabe was 'unbelievable focused and squared away' because the traitor's 'club' planned for the possible firing of Comey the night Hillary lost the election. It was only a matter of time.
I look at Baker's comment a few different ways - at first it made me think Baker wasn't present. Then I realized his statement gives him cover - he didn't 'know' or expect McCabe to have it all under control (i.e., I wasn't in on any planning meetings - this was a surprise to me) and it gives McCabe cover (e.g., the reason McCabe didn't miss a beat and instead launched all these efforts supporting Rosensteins plan is that he outdid himself this time- he didn't know in advance.)
GROK AI analysis of Q movement theories (8ch and other anon sites) of the 7 people who attended the secret SCIF meeting the night Hillary lost the election (November 2016) .
Barack Obama (Shadow Government Manager)
Hillary Clinton
Loretta Lynch (Attorney General)
James Comey (FBI Director)
Andrew McCabe (FBI Deputy Director)
Peter Strzok (FBI Counterintelligence Agent, lead on Clinton email and Russia probes)
Sally Yates (Deputy Attorney General)
John Brennan (CIA Director) or Susan Rice (National Security Advisor) as the seventh (debated; some cited flight logs or Strzok texts implying intelligence community involvement)
GROK: These names were drawn from flight manifests, Strzok-Page text leaks, and 2019 congressional testimonies (e.g., Strzok's closed-door hearing where he referenced post-election strategy sessions).
ransomnote: I like Grok's list because the actual real-world impacts/responses to Hillary's loss were carried out by the DOJ. Barack was in charge of the shadow government. I would think Soros would probably use Barack Hussein to manage.
They could use FVEY to communicate with others not in attendence so I don't know. I would think Soros would want decision power. Too much speculation - I still don't know enough.
At that meeting, they discussed what to do when Trump fired Comey - it was only a matter of time once Trump took office. It's logical for McCabe to be there because he would at that point abruptly be taking over the FBI enacting Obama's plans.
They created multiple plans before each went back home to fully polish their plans and tell the rest of the traitors. When Comey was fired they already had a plan.

Why wouldn't James Baker attend in place of Lisa Page? Page is not senior DOJ.
McCabe doesn't have to be there because Comey is going to develop the plan ahead of time and teach McCabe what to do when Comey is fired. That's why McCabe is 'squared away' despite the 'shocking' departure of McCabe. I see him as a fixer or follower and Comey as an aircraft carrier.
Since I don't think McCabe attended, I don't believe Peter STrzok attended - he's junior to McCabe and follows orders - not top management.
Yates is not senior and can be instructed by Lynch. She handles things for Barry but in delegation, it seems. I think the 7 had to contribute executive plans.
I believe Soros would be there - if his minions didn't win the election he would step in to fix it, not trusting them to save it without his oversight/approval. He would not want to check in on all these people and followup.
My 'Table for Seven' under construction.
Soros?
Barack Obama (Shadow Government Manager)
Hillary Clinton
Loretta Lynch (Attorney General)
James Comey (FBI Director)
Susan Rice (National Security Advisor)
John Brennan (CIA Director)
I had been thinking the plans made by the 7 on Election night 2016 were enacted in a separate effort in 2017, after Comey's firing, per the original plan (e.g., if we lose Comey we have to go nuclear) which would not necessarily require the same people.
The content I review seems to blend what might be 'plan rollout' and separate 'plan design' actors talking. Page is on Grok's list for texting Strok. Yes, she texts strzok and there was an insurance plan, but it doesn't mean she was there on election night as a lawyer jr to James Baker. Baker was the top level gate keeper.
I think I have painted myself into a corner at this point so I'll stop for the night and hope my brain cells multiply over night.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stray notes
RR 25th Amendment
May 8, 2017 Trump fired Comey and McCabe because Acting Director, FBI
May 9, McCabe said he began re-evaluating (fake concern that Trump was Russia controlled)
May 16, 2017 Rod Rosenstein discussed the 25th Amendment

May 24? Rosenstein started Russia collusions w/MuellerMay 24?
Per trash article by NYT, Rosenstein suggested wearing a wire.

If Grok is correct, than I should swap out Rice and swap in Clapper (see GROK report below).

Unless I find better sources, :

My 'Table for Seven'

Soros?
Barack Obama (Shadow Government Manager)
Hillary Clinton
Loretta Lynch (Attorney General)
James Comey (FBI Director)
James Clapper (DNI Director)
John Brennan (CIA Director)

My Grok Request:
I will provide a hypothetical scenario and ask you to analyze it. My scenario is that foreign controlled infiltrators have succeeded in infiltrating many senior roles in the DOJ and the White House, as well as others in cabinet positions. IN my scenario, if foreign infiltrators in the Presidency and the DOJ want to create plans to unseat the president elect or the president by false accusations, FISA, 25th amendment, spying on the campaign or president elect, which intel agencies would best support that effort. I need to understand the separate functions of intel agencies, in particular, the directors of DNI and NSA. Rank DOJ senior positions (law, fbi, cia, dni, nsa etc.) in order of their usefulness in carrying out a collection of DOJ objectives to appear to remove the president by legal means with accusations of treason.
Grok AI Responds:
Functions of Key U.S. Intelligence Agencies
To analyze your hypothetical scenario, it's essential to first outline the distinct roles of major U.S. intelligence agencies, based on their statutory mandates and operational focus. The U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) consists of 18 organizations, but the ones most relevant here are the FBI, CIA, NSA, and the overarching DNI office. These agencies operate under different chains of command: the FBI falls under the Department of Justice (DOJ), while the CIA, NSA, and DNI are part of the broader IC, coordinated by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) but reporting primarily to the President and National Security Council.
Here's a concise overview of their core functions:

Agency Parent Organization Primary Functions Key Limitations
FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) Department of Justice (DOJ) - Domestic law enforcement and counterintelligence. - Investigates federal crimes, including treason (18 U.S.C. § 2381). - Collects intelligence on U.S. persons (citizens/residents) and threats within U.S. borders. - Applies for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants to monitor suspected foreign agents or spies, even if they involve U.S. persons (e.g., via Section 702 for foreign targets or Title I for individuals). - Leads election security and campaign-related probes. Cannot conduct covert actions abroad; must adhere to strict domestic privacy rules (e.g., Fourth Amendment).
CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) Independent (under DNI coordination) - Foreign human intelligence (HUMINT) collection via spies, assets, and analysis. - Covert operations and paramilitary activities overseas. - Analyzes foreign threats and supports policy with non-U.S. focused intel. - Coordinates with foreign partners for liaison relationships. Prohibited from domestic surveillance or operations on U.S. soil (Executive Order 12333); focuses exclusively on foreign entities/citizens.
NSA (National Security Agency) Department of Defense (under DNI coordination) - Signals intelligence (SIGINT): Collects, processes, and analyzes electronic communications (e.g., phone, email, cyber). - Cybersecurity for national defense. - Provides raw data to other IC members for foreign threats. - Supports FISA-authorized collection but does not apply for warrants itself. Primarily foreign-focused; incidental collection on U.S. persons must be minimized and shared only with agencies like the FBI for domestic use. No law enforcement role.
DNI (Director of National Intelligence) Independent (ODNI) - Oversees and coordinates the entire IC (18 agencies). - Serves as principal advisor to the President on intelligence matters. - Manages intelligence cycle: tasking collection, analysis, and dissemination. - Prepares National Intelligence Estimates and declassifies info when needed. No direct collection or operational role; acts as a coordinator, not an executor. Lacks command authority over individual agencies.
Focus on DNI and NSA
DNI: Established by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, the DNI does not "spy" directly but ensures the IC's efforts align with national priorities. In your scenario, a compromised DNI could task agencies like the NSA or CIA to prioritize surveillance or analysis framing the president-elect as a foreign agent (e.g., via a fabricated "foreign nexus" for treason). However, the DNI's power is more about orchestration than execution—e.g., directing a joint assessment that amplifies false intel to support DOJ actions.
NSA: As the IC's "eavesdropper," the NSA excels at bulk collection of global communications under programs like PRISM or UPSTREAM, authorized by FISA Section 702. It could provide raw SIGINT data (e.g., intercepted calls linking the president-elect to "foreign adversaries") to the FBI for domestic follow-up. In the scenario, this would be crucial for spying on campaigns, but NSA data alone isn't prosecutable— it requires FBI/DOJ processing into "evidence." The NSA Director reports dually to the Secretary of Defense and DNI, limiting unilateral domestic actions.
These functions create a division of labor: the FBI handles the "legal" domestic interface (e.g., warrants, arrests), while NSA/CIA provide upstream foreign intel, and DNI glues it together.
Intelligence Agencies Best Suited to Support the Hypothetical Effort
In your scenario—foreign infiltrators in DOJ/White House roles plotting to unseat a president or president-elect via false treason accusations, FISA-enabled spying, or 25th Amendment invocation—the agencies would support by generating/manipulating intel to create a veneer of legality. Treason requires proof of "levying war" or "adhering to enemies" (U.S. Const. art. III, § 3), so the plot would fabricate foreign ties. FISA spying targets "agents of foreign powers," providing a hook. The 25th Amendment (invoked by VP + majority cabinet declaring incapacity) has no formal IC role but could be indirectly bolstered by intel alleging foreign-compromised mental state (e.g., blackmail).
Best-supporting agencies, ranked by operational fit:
FBI: Most direct enabler. It applies for FISA warrants (via DOJ's National Security Division), investigates domestic threats, and builds criminal cases. Historical precedents (e.g., 2016 Crossfire Hurricane probe) show FBI leading campaign surveillance under FISA. A compromised FBI Director could initiate false probes, plant evidence, and refer to special counsel for impeachment-like proceedings.
NSA: Provides the technical backbone for spying (SIGINT on communications). It could feed "incriminating" intercepts to the FBI, framing routine contacts as treasonous. Useful for campaign monitoring if a foreign link is invented.
DNI: Coordinates cross-agency efforts, e.g., tasking NSA/CIA for a unified "assessment" of foreign influence on the president-elect. Could declassify selective intel to leak damaging narratives, supporting public/ congressional pressure for 25th invocation or impeachment.
CIA: Least domestic but valuable for fabricating foreign "collusion" narratives (e.g., HUMINT alleging adversary ties). Could run covert ops to "discover" planted evidence abroad, but domestic limits make it secondary.
The FBI is the linchpin, as it bridges intel to DOJ prosecutions, making actions appear "legal."
Ranking of Senior Positions by Usefulness in DOJ-Led Objectives
Your query specifies ranking "DOJ senior positions (law, fbi, cia, dni, nsa etc.)" for advancing a "collection of DOJ objectives" to legally unseat via treason accusations. I'll interpret "law" as the Attorney General (AG) or DOJ legal leadership (e.g., Office of Legal Counsel for opinions justifying actions). Note: CIA, DNI, and NSA are not under DOJ (they're IC elements), but in the scenario, infiltrated DOJ roles could leverage them via coordination. "Etc." suggests including related roles like Deputy AG.
The objectives involve: (1) spying/FISA for evidence; (2) false treason case-building; (3) 25th support via "incapacity" intel; (4) legal facade (warrants, indictments). Usefulness is ranked by proximity to DOJ execution, control over evidence, and ability to influence legal processes.

Agency	Parent Organization	Primary Functions	Key Limitations
FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation)	Department of Justice (DOJ)	- Domestic law enforcement and counterintelligence. - Investigates federal crimes, including treason (18 U.S.C. § 2381). - Collects intelligence on U.S. persons (citizens/residents) and threats within U.S. borders. - Applies for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants to monitor suspected foreign agents or spies, even if they involve U.S. persons (e.g., via Section 702 for foreign targets or Title I for individuals). - Leads election security and campaign-related probes.	Cannot conduct covert actions abroad; must adhere to strict domestic privacy rules (e.g., Fourth Amendment).
CIA (Central Intelligence Agency)	Independent (under DNI coordination)	- Foreign human intelligence (HUMINT) collection via spies, assets, and analysis. - Covert operations and paramilitary activities overseas. - Analyzes foreign threats and supports policy with non-U.S. focused intel. - Coordinates with foreign partners for liaison relationships.	Prohibited from domestic surveillance or operations on U.S. soil (Executive Order 12333); focuses exclusively on foreign entities/citizens.
NSA (National Security Agency)	Department of Defense (under DNI coordination)	- Signals intelligence (SIGINT): Collects, processes, and analyzes electronic communications (e.g., phone, email, cyber). - Cybersecurity for national defense. - Provides raw data to other IC members for foreign threats. - Supports FISA-authorized collection but does not apply for warrants itself.	Primarily foreign-focused; incidental collection on U.S. persons must be minimized and shared only with agencies like the FBI for domestic use. No law enforcement role.
DNI (Director of National Intelligence)	Independent (ODNI)	- Oversees and coordinates the entire IC (18 agencies). - Serves as principal advisor to the President on intelligence matters. - Manages intelligence cycle: tasking collection, analysis, and dissemination. - Prepares National Intelligence Estimates and declassifies info when needed.	No direct collection or operational role; acts as a coordinator, not an executor. Lacks command authority over individual agencies.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.