[Lazamataz]

Holy crap. I could easily run a local (unrestricted) AI in my home office.

NIIIICCCCEEEEE............

Ping me to be added to the ᎪᎡᎢᏆᎱᏆᏟᏆᎪᏞ ᏆᏁᎢᎬᏞᏞᏆᏀᎬᏁᏟᎬ ᏢᏆᏁᏀ ᏞᏆᏚᎢ

[HombreSecreto]

Unrestricted AI?

Sounds like my ex-wife.

A lot more than $50 though...

[Colorado Doug]

I want one. I also want a 10kw ish nuclear reactor to power my home. Please ping me when those become available. Surplus would be okay too. I am not a snob.

[usconservative]

The s1 paper suggests that reasoning models can be distilled using a relatively small dataset through supervised fine-tuning (SFT), a more cost-effective method compared to large-scale reinforcement learning, which DeepSeek used to train its own model, R1. SFT allows AI models to mimic specific behaviours in a dataset, achieving high reasoning performance with lower costs.

Dude, it's a very small dataset focused on ONE set of facts, designed for specific queries.

If the commie chinese taught us anything with DeepSeek its this:

LLM's aren't the way. Focused, well trained, smaller, distributed, FOCUSED AI engines are far faster, will scale out better, be more efficient, and deliver better, more consistent results.

The above statement comes with a large number of assumptions, the biggest being this: The smaller, more focused and trained AI becomes, the more dependent on UNBIASED information they are to be properly trained and provide reliable results.

This is where DeepSeek FAILED: heavily biased algorithms with government approved data to train them. (Knew THIS point specifically as soon as I started reading up on DeepSeek and how the Chinese did it.)

BTW, I've told you this before: It's relatively easy to run a small AI engine at home with a proper graphics card (I believe I recommended one to you when you were building your PC). The instructions on running a small Docker packaged AI engine are out there. I do it on my Ubuntu Linux server @ home.