Posted on 12/09/2024 1:32:03 PM PST by nickcarraway
After 50 years, Francis Ford Coppola has one regret about making what is largely considered the best sequel of all time.
According to the 5x Oscar winner, Hollywood’s ever-growing obsession with continuations is the result of his petty demands for making The Godfather Part II (1974), for which he fought Paramount Pictures on returning the director’s chair after the original 1972 was a major hit.
“They said, basically, ‘Francis, you’ve made Coca-Cola. You’re gonna stop making colas?'” recalled Coppola to The Washington Post.
Related Stories Francis Ford Coppola Francis Ford Coppola To Receive 50th AFI Life Achievement Award In April ‘Megalopolis’ Interview with Francis Ford Coppola and Adam Driver Francis Coppola & Adam Driver On “The Death Of Journalism & The Death Of The Hollywood Studio System”; How ‘Megalopolis’ Reception Might Evolve Like ‘Apocalypse Now’ Did In attempt to get out of directing the sequel, Coppola suggested up-and-coming director Martin Scorsese take the reins.
When Paramount rejected the idea, Coppola made some seemingly unreasonable demands, including a then-exorbitant $1 million paycheck and the addition of ‘Part II’ to the title (he was inspired by the Russian films Ivan the Terrible, Part I [1944] and Ivan the Terrible, Part II: The Boyars’ Plot [1958]). Although the studio thought it was a crazy idea, they ultimately agreed.
Al Pacino in The Godfather Part II (1974). “So I’m the jerk that started numbers on movies,” Coppola added. “I’m embarrassed, and I apologize to everyone.”
Meanwhile, The Godfather Part II won six Oscars, including Best Picture, Best Director for Coppola and Best Adapted Screenplay for him and author Mario Puzo. The film currently holds a 96% Tomatometer score on Rotten Tomatoes and a 97% audience rating.
Coppola’s comments come after this year’s Dune: Part Two and amid the wait for Wicked: Part Two, coming to theaters Nov. 21, 2025.
did you read the article he credited his inspiration for numbering the godfather movies to a movie made 20 years prior called Ivan the great 1&2. he is only claiming to popularize the use of numbers in the titles not that he was first.
Coppola hit it big with the Godfather movies
but his $120 million Megaloplis bombed......
So he’s making up stuff so he can pump the flop.
Probably has a lot of his own money in the bomb.
I blame him for ‘Highlander 2’ and ‘Caddyshack 2’.
~~~
Haha! Two great first movies that were shamed hard by their sequels.
How about Major League 2 or Nerds 2 in Paradise.
I nominate Star Trek II Wrath of Khan as the one of the best ever sequels compared to the first one.
The Naked Gun 2½: The Smell of Fear
Thanks for the tip! I’m always on the lookout for new things to watch.
I’ve been watching an enjoyable Netflix series “The Lincoln Lawyer.” Good crime / legal drama.
It made me pursue the career choice of stealing rugs. Oh wait, forget I said that.
“Blues Brothers 2000” (released in 1998) was pretty bad.
It was fun to see some of the old characters back in the sequel (ex: the owner of Bob’s Country Bunker) but it was just not the same.
All things considered, the sequel shouldn’t have been made.
VERY, VERY Highly recommended!
Planet of the Apes came out in 1968. Beneath the Planet of the Apes came out in 1970. Escape from the Planet of the Apes came out in 1971. Just an example of how the premise of the article is flawed. Actually 2 examples. Planet of the Apes had 2 more sequels and a TV show before the complete remake and the sequels to the remakes. How many Godfather movies were there?
Beetlejuice 2 was pathetic.
I enjoyed it as well UNTIL it went gay.
“UNTIL it went gay.”
Yes, the hints of the black girl’s girlfriend just started. Ugh. So far it’s low-key, but it never EVER stays low-key.
There was a “Caddyshack2”?
Wrath of Khan gets my vote too. Empire Strikes Back too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.