[sten]

when Tucker is interviewing, he’s letting them say what they’re going to say.

that’s what an interviewer is supposed to do.

otherwise, he’d be injecting his thoughts into the answers.

[DIRTYSECRET]

Election season-raised eyebrows. Going the way of O’rielly?

[anton]

Yea, have we gotten so used to blow hard Sean Hannity’s talking point rants we expect everyone to do the same? Or, if we don’t agree with the interviewee do he call him a Nazi and tell him to shut his pie hole? Sounds like MSNBC to me.

[Robert DeLong]

I agree, but for some not pushing back =- agreeance with what is being said. They cannot distinguish that allowing people to speak their interpretation is denial of freedom of speech. Others can choose to agree with the speaker of reject the speaker. Tucker has faith in this who watch Tucker to make the correct conclusion.

In this case , it's the fact that Copper is wrong. Because the other option available to Hitler was to take them to the borders and turn them loose, while informing them that trying to return was instant death.