Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Melian

That supports exactly what I feared. I’ve never been able to make my
equipment go fast enough to capture a shot like that. It turns out that it’s
because none of my equipment can take useable 1/8000th of a second photo
at ANY frame rate. Not even close. I thought it would require an expensive
fast shutter speed camera with a serious lens, and it seems it does.

But more than that, there’s a reason such fast shutter speeds are rarely used.
They trade off light gathering ability, thus detail.

The reason someone would want a 1/8000th of a second exposure is to
stop the motion blur of extremely fast moving “stuff” to keep it all in focus.
That’s much too short a time to gather very many photons, so a pretty serious
lens is also part of any kit intended for such use.

No doubt that any serious professional photographer’s kit would indeed be
up to the task these days, but what was the photographer expecting, to
cause him to sacrifice potential image quality while photographing a
subject NOT expected to be moving at 2000+ feet per second?

~Easy


1,517 posted on 07/18/2024 12:42:36 AM PDT by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see. #MAGA-A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1504 | View Replies ]


To: Tellurian; EasySt

ThankQ! I know very little about cameras or velocity.


1,627 posted on 07/18/2024 9:42:03 AM PDT by Melian (✳✴️ Reminder: Memes are made to make you think or laugh. Verify for yourself before reposting. ✳️✴️)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1517 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson