class action civil suit ?
count me in
fauci and accomplices made millions,, billions off their crimes
then we need a rico
then a criminal prosecution
imho
“This story is a summary of posts on X and may evolve over time. Grok can make mistakes, verify its outputs.
I agree with you completely, I also would join in the lawsuit, even though I myself have not taken the 🧬 therapy shot, many in my family have, even though I strongly advised them not to. I would also hold the MSM responsible.
https://calmatters.org/education/2024/06/covid-vaccine-mandate-schools/
Even though Los Angeles Unified dropped its COVID vaccine mandate for school staff almost a year ago, a lawsuit accusing the district of violating workers’ rights can still move forward, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Friday. Â
The 2-1 ruling by a pair of federal judges appointed by former President Donald Trump revives a case that a lower court had dismissed. It also counters recent rulings by courts —  including the 9th Circuit — that tossed lawsuits challenging expired COVID-19 rules on the grounds that the policies were no longer in effect.
The judges in the majority wrote this case was different because they found L.A. Unified demonstrated a pattern of “withdrawing and reinstating its vaccination policies” over the course of the lawsuit.Â
“Accordingly, LAUSD has not carried its heavy burden to show that there is no reasonable possibility that it will again revert to imposing a similar policy,” the opinion states wrote.
They also indicated they were open to arguments over the effectiveness of the vaccine, which the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention describes as a safe way to build immunity against COVID-19.
“At this stage, we must accept Plaintiffs’ allegations that the vaccine does not prevent the spread of COVID-19 as true
In a concurring opinion, Judge Daniel Collins invoked Supreme Court precedent that “compulsory treatment for the health benefit of the person treated — as opposed to compulsory treatment for the health benefit of others — implicates the fundamental right to refuse medical treatment.”
It looks like the paragraph below was taken way out of context for the X/Twitter post:
The plaintiffs alleged that the vaccines do not prevent someone from becoming infected with COVID-19 and characterized it as a treatment rather than a “traditional vaccine.”
They argued that by requiring employees to get the COVID shot, the school district was interfering with workers’ right to refuse medical treatment.
“No one with any credibility would tell you that the vaccine prevented COVID or stopped the spread,” said John Howard, a San Diego attorney who argued the case on behalf of a handful of Los Angeles Unified employees and an Idaho-based group called the Health Freedom Defense Fund that’s filed several other COVID vaccine lawsuits.Â
“But when the hysteria was going on, that’s exactly what pharmaceutical companies and others said,” Howard said. “It was false.”
EUA applied to the vaxx developers.
Those who physically administered the vaxx are still culpable...
Each ‘delivery technician, from an OP-nurse to a pharmacy tech can be held \personally\ liable under this law.
Not withstanding the current 9th Circuit decision.
Unlawful Death (Wrongful Death)
Unlawful death refers to a death that is caused by the intentional or negligent actions of another person or entity. This can include deaths resulting from criminal acts, such as murder, manslaughter, or reckless behavior, as well as deaths caused by negligence, such as medical malpractice or product liability.
can I sue on behalf of my father? He would do it himself but clot shot one gave him a stroke. clot shot two killed him.
The Fauci meme at that link should be on billboards.
There was no informed consent. The government used the full force of their power to coerce people into taking the “vaccine” against their will. No one involved should have immunity.
A government agency help create the virus and then used the media to lie about the “pandemic” which allowed them to manipulate an election (talk about election interference).
The government lied and people died.
Starting to get interesting. Discovery should be fun to watch.
Point's 1-5 of this article expose Fauci et. al. for lying about the 'vaccine'. Here are a few excerpts:
Fauci Confesses that Covid Vaccines Could Never Have Worked as Claimed
Facts previously dismissed as misinformation now admitted.
By HART Group, published on 15 February 2023
On 11 January 2023 a paper was published in Cell Host & Microbe titled “Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenza viruses, and other respiratory viruses”.
There are just 3 authors, one of whom is Anthony Fauci, who served as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) from 1984 to 2022, and the chief medical advisor to the President from 2021 to 2022.
SNIP
Fauci made some bold claims about the Covid vaccines in order to justify such coercive policies, including that they would prevent infections and limit transmission of the virus to others. These claims were then picked up by political leaders worldwide and used to justify their own policies, even when – from early data – it became obvious that the vaccines did not prevent infections or reduce the viral load of those infected.
SNIP
In summary, this article reads like an admission of failure – of the vaccines to prevent infection and transmission at least. But the most notable point is that the reasons given are based on immunological theory and knowledge which was commonly known before 2020, meaning that the assertions made about them preventing infection and transmission must have been known – or at least strongly suspected – to be untrue. Is this lying? We leave it to the reader to judge.
Even after data emerged which confirmed the inability to block infection and transmission, the voices raising this were suppressed and censored by forces seemingly under the control of US Federal agencies, as we have seen from the “Twitter files” releases.
Here’s the ruling:
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/22-55908/22-55908-2024-06-07.html
HEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE FUND, INC. V. ALBERTO CARVALHO, No. 22-55908 (9th Cir. 2024)
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2024/06/07/22-55908.pdf
Addressing the merits, the panel held that the district court misapplied the Supreme Court’s decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), in concluding that the Policy survived rational basis review. Jacobson held that mandatory vaccinations were rationally related to preventing the spread of smallpox. Here, however, plaintiffs allege that the vaccine does not effectively prevent spread but only mitigates symptoms for the recipient and therefore is akin to a medical treatment, not a “traditional” vaccine. Taking plaintiffs’ allegations as true at this stage of litigation, plaintiffs plausibly alleged that the COVID-19 vaccine does not effectively “prevent the spread” of COVID-19. Thus, Jacobson does not apply.
Finally, and they should allow everyone at NIH that raked in profits need to be sued as well. Hear that Fauxchi?
Confirmation of My 2021 Hypothesis that the Spike Protein Induces Accelerated Aging
A paper published June 9th, confirms the findings. This is an incredible danger of repeated exposure to the Spike Protein.https://t.co/U6KCeN8xl4 pic.twitter.com/rN5UosBjXx— Walter M Chesnut (@Parsifaler) June 10, 2024
AMAZED this came out of the 9th circuit, pigs just flew past my kitchen window!!!