[Dead Corpse]

This article is 3 years old.

The original GOP bill would have failed a Constitutional challenge so she rightly Vetoed it until they could pen a new bill, which she signed, that didn’t have the Constitutional flaws.

[PMAS]

That’s not what she said at the time - she said they would get sued and loose NCAA affiliation for SD schools

[Loud Mime]

The issue belongs to the sportsmen, not the lawyers.

If the woman refused to compete, the issue would have been dead.

[Responsibility2nd]

3 years old? So why is it posted?

Because snowflakes are adding to their “Noem is a puppy murderer” rhetoric.

I’m surprised they are not running with the unfounded claim that Noem and Lewandowski were bumping uglies.

[No.6]

Thanks!

For those panicking: Mar 29, 2021

Why was this thread started today?

[redfreedom]

“This article is 3 years old.”

Makes one wonder just why this ancient stuff is being dug up?

[DesertRhino]

No, she was swayed by the threats from the financial and credit card industry. So she “found” constitutional flaws and didn’t even try..
She signed a watered down one.

And then she has been getting busy with Cory Lewandowsky.

[TangoLimaSierra]

The original GOP bill would have failed a Constitutional challenge so she rightly Vetoed it until they could pen a new bill, which she signed, that didn’t have the Constitutional flaws.

Don't come here with your logic and evidence. We want to dump on any conservative who does something we don't understand. We are the crabs in the bottom of the bucket.

[AAABEST]

Oh look, the idiot Noem apologist who called us all names yesterday.

We were all there when she did it and remember exactly what happened. We also remember her banging Corey Lewamdowski while married.