I think the whole stupid debate about the date is merely over the difference of how the report reported the date, which I believe was nothing more or less than the interpretation of the modern meaning of the actual date on the coin. No, the coin itself did not say “135 C.E.”. That is just the interpretation of whatever actual date markings there are on the coin.
Correct. Which is what I said, then said again. It would have been convenient for the writer to give us both, but hey, that’s Haaretz for you, trying to erase Judaism and Zionism.