Returning to your allegations that this treatment for sickle cell is the ‘exact same technology’ as mRNA vaccines:
grey_whiskers wrote: There you go, lying through your teeth again troll. If the exact same technology (mRNA encased in a nanolipid particle) is explicitly used for genetic engineering, then it is intrinsically possible for (mRNA encased in a nanolipid particle) to effect genetic changes.”
Fox news has this article explaining the treatment:
Quote begins:
To receive the treatment, patients will undergo a bone marrow transplant.
First, the patient will receive medication to help stem cells move from the bone marrow into the bloodstream. Next, the blood will be collected and the stem cells isolated.
The cells then will be shipped to a laboratory, where genetic technology will be used to edit their DNA.
The patient will then receive chemotherapy to destroy all potential stem cells, ideally, that could produce sickle cells in the future.
The edited cells then will be infused back into the patient under the monitoring of health care professionals, who will ensure that healthy cells are produced in the bone marrow.
Quote Ends.
https://www.foxnews.com/health/remarkable-gene-editing-treatment-sickle-cell-disease-approved-fda
Evidently, you must have received a far different vaccinaton that the rest of us if you underwent a bone marrow transplant, had your stem cells removed, and received chemotherapy.
It should be abundantly clear that mRNA vaccine technology isn’t the technology used for this sickle cell treatment.
I graciously accept your apology for calling me a liar and a troll.
That’s a different treatment than the one in Chemical & Engineering News, which was just mRNA /LNP and has been implemented in a mouse model.
They are distinct because I wrote posts here on FR about the methodology from Fix News you describe, saying the C&EN methodology would be competition for them (the type of procedure Fox News News describes, used to cost half a million without the CRISPR step, when done for leukemia).