Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Salvavida

See post 26, this question is now 50 years out of date, they got into the (general) military 50 years ago and ruined it and made it increasingly ineffective.

People still respond to this as though all their arguments for females in the military were not already destroyed and exposed since it became a reality so many years ago.


65 posted on 09/23/2023 3:50:07 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

Realism just entered the chat.

Not even a populist president like Trump is going to be able to put the genie back into the bottle absent a MAJOR change in American culture. We may want a 2% women in the military— but it’s not happening. Our aim should be on what is realistic. We are not going to be able to return to an America 50 years ago.

However, with the data the US Marines developed in their Warfighting laboratory, a Commander in Chief can restrict women to only non-combat MOSs, and remove them from operational-level combat commands.

That will limit them to strategic and garrison duties.


77 posted on 09/23/2023 4:45:19 PM PDT by Salvavida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson