“The US state department publicly admitted that there were US government funded and owned bio labs in the Ukraine, quite a few of them, in fact. Why were they there? Not for anything good.”
The US funds labs all over the world. But funding a bio WEAPONS lab? Show your objective evidence; hearsay and innuendo and speculation won’t cut it. If the objective evidence supports your claim, then the US should be held to account. But you seem to be condemning the accused even before an indictment, let alone a trial. That’s called a rush to judgment, and guilty until proven innocent; which, in such places as Russia, is the standard. No wonder you apply it.
The idea they are "weapons labs" is not very plausible. Why would you put your most sensitive military laboratories in a corrupt country on the border of a major adversary? We do not develop our "black operations technology" in foreign countries. It is done with the utmost secrecy where we can protect it and keep it secret.
I have little doubt Ukrainian soldiers are being given drugs to enhance their performance. The USA, Japan, and Germany all did so in WWII. There are probably others who did so as well, almost certainly the Soviet Union, but I do not recall their use in WWII by the USSR as clearly.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Irina Yarovaya presented the outcome report of the Parliamentary Commission on Investigation into Activities of the US Biological Laboratories in Ukraine PLUS MY COMMENTS, ought-six wrote: |
“The US state department publicly admitted that there were US government funded and owned bio labs in the Ukraine, quite a few of them, in fact. Why were they there? Not for anything good.” The US funds labs all over the world. But funding a bio WEAPONS lab? Show your objective evidence; hearsay and innuendo and speculation won’t cut it. If the objective evidence supports your claim, then the US should be held to account. But you seem to be condemning the accused even before an indictment, let alone a trial. That’s called a rush to judgment, and guilty until proven innocent; which, in such places as Russia, is the standard. No wonder you apply it. |
You negate any claim made outside the mainstream media as unworthy of consideration. NATO and the US aren't going to admit to it, as NATO won't either. This is the information blackout you support. I guess you weren't around when Fauci was exposed for funding gain-of-function research? Did you know about Burisma and that Pelosi, Schumer, Biden all have criminal activities and graft there? Remember Biden extorting the Ukrainian minister to get the prosecutor investigating Hunter fired? Remember Trump asking Zelensky to investigate the Biden crimes and Zelensky refusing to do so? The Ukraine is a crime hub protected from investigation.
You try to smear a FReeper for having an opinion, but having an opinion happens all the time. I haven't personally touched or handled the documents exposing Biden family crimes and I have the opinion they are valid. No one here is pretending to be judge and jury - you're sitting in the court of public opinion. There is no jury and no rush to judgement. You sure are eager to brand people 'guilty' of having an opinion you don't like.
Your stance seems to be that there are zero clandestine US bio weapons labs.
You are much more trusting of the current controlling US military and political structures than am I.
This thread may be off the mark but at least someone is having a go at investigative journalism. The media that used to perform such duties are now little more than propaganda script readers and cheerleaders.
“The US funds labs all over the world.”
News to me and, I think, to most Americans.