To: dennisw
AI is certainly artificial, but there is nothing “intelligent” about it.
2 posted on
04/17/2023 3:47:16 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████. FJB.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
AI is certainly artificial, but there is nothing “intelligent” about it.
As a systems analyst and software engineer, I heard about 'artificial intelligence' over 40 years ago. Back then, I failed to see or detect any 'intelligence' with the programs or algorithms. I still don't see it, not even in any of the chatAI systems or algorithms. Systems architects are having a whale of a good time trying to convince others, especially the tech-ignorant, that there is something to worry about with this 'new' tech. Far from it. But, people scare easy and it's good marketing that popularizes the technology and brings in funding for more research.
One thing for sure, it's not 'artificial intelligence' since, all the intelligence that goes into it, is from the people that programmed those systems.
9 posted on
04/17/2023 4:02:10 PM PDT by
adorno
To: E. Pluribus Unum
When asked if the hallucination problem will be solved in the future, Pichai noted “it’s a matter of intense debate,” Well there are two paths to fix it.
1) Stop filling it full of woke BS.
2) Stop feeding it magic mushrooms.
See tag line.
18 posted on
04/17/2023 4:24:00 PM PDT by
usurper
(AI was born with a birth defect.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Maybe they’re hallucinating because of the delusions the SJW programmers code into them.
20 posted on
04/17/2023 4:31:03 PM PDT by
Westbrook
(The Democrats are wizards at two things: Finding votes and losing evidence.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Nothing intelligent at all about it - its programmers are leftists so the AI lies to you. All you get back is liberal clap trap, same as todays search algorithims.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson