I’m not familiar with the specifics obivously, but they said in the article that the 600k included inactive and canceled registrations not just active and inactive. The Nevada SOS doesn’t list registrations that have been canceled. The claim is that some of the “canceled” registrations magically become active when the election occurs, then go back to canceled afterwards.
That would be a serious problem — and an even better reason to supply a link to the data so we can determine the scope of “canceled” voters.
In Washoe County, close to 80% of the voting age population are on the rolls as active voters. Nationally, this is not an abnormal figure by any means.
But if ERIC can expand Democrat vote fraud possibilities by fudging up just a comparatively small number of fictitious voters, that may be all it takes to swing an election outcome in this state which historically has very close outcomes all over the place — which the Republicans nearly always lose aside from occasionally getting some GOPe squish as Governor (rendered impotent by the legislature anyway).
Democrats would be smarter to have ERIC spend its time in Clark County rather than Washoe — and I’m sure it does — because far more elections can be skewed in that manner, and in such a large county the fraud would be easier to conceal.
In both counties, especially Clark, the number of active registrations has already exploded since 2018.