“PayPal is not fining people for misinformation and this language was never intended to be inserted in our policy...”
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4099244/posts
” ... and this language was never intended to be inserted in our policy ... “
Whether or not the language was intended to be inserted into policy, someone did write it, and someone did insert it into the policy. Possibly the same someone. Who wrote it? If it was “never intended to be inserted into the policy”, then why was it written in the first place? Has that person or those people been identified? Have they been sanctioned? Also, who inserted it into the policy? Has that person or those people been identified? Have they been sanctioned? If it was never intended to be inserted into policy, where was it intended to be used? What was the intended purpose of the language, if not for company policy?
These are the sorts of questions that the gaslight media never troubles itself to ask, let alone dig around and actually answer.
Even to consider this, PayPal sucks!
Seems like PayPal threw this out there as a trial balloon. Right now the woketards are throwing đź’© against the wall to see what sticks.
It was never intended to be found out
They were trying out a social credit score. They and other companies and the democrat party will keep trying.
Donald Trump Jr.
@DonaldJTrumpJr
“Language was never intended to be inserted in our policy” - as if it happened by accident and wasn’t reviewed by teams of lawyers before it was added.