I have told a lot of people that if you
allow major communications companies to censor speech, you will get government coercing them from behind closed doors to censor speech the government doesn't like.
Corporations that carry public speech cannot be allowed to censor it. This must be forbidden. The first amendment must be made to apply to them.
To: semimojo
Got another one for you Semimojo.
2 posted on
09/01/2022 3:43:05 PM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: DiogenesLamp
3 posted on
09/01/2022 3:48:42 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
To: DiogenesLamp
As agents of the state, it would indeed be a 1A violation.
5 posted on
09/01/2022 3:53:49 PM PDT by
fruser1
To: DiogenesLamp
Well, how else are they going to bring about their permanent police state they so desperately want?
6 posted on
09/01/2022 4:47:37 PM PDT by
Bullish
(Rot'sa Ruck America. )
To: DiogenesLamp
If the supreme court abolished it’s very own contrived opinion establishing “qualified immunity” the feds could all Personally be sued into Bankruptcy.
7 posted on
09/01/2022 5:35:56 PM PDT by
eyeamok
(founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
To: DiogenesLamp
they are outsourcing the censorship
they are saving a ton of money by using private parties to silence people
should help the deficit
8 posted on
09/01/2022 5:47:51 PM PDT by
joshua c
(to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
To: DiogenesLamp
Twutter is nt really bowing to anything. The FBI is part of Twitter’s founding.
9 posted on
09/01/2022 6:30:06 PM PDT by
arthurus
( covfefe 0)
To: DiogenesLamp
The first amendment must be made to apply to them.At least you recognize that it doesn’t today. What other parts of the Constitution must we re-write?
10 posted on
09/01/2022 11:44:06 PM PDT by
semimojo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
