Replies

Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow

A: So, the FBI/DOJ claim that documents at Mar-a-Largo may have been moved and they were told they could not access them when they were executing a subpoena. And to them, this raises questions of “obstruction”. Well, I have some questions for them...

B: 1.The former president and his staff are free to look through the boxes, or even move them if the former president seeks access to them, so when you say they may have been moved, what are you claiming? That they were moved for the purpose of concealing them from you? How so?

C: Where would they have moved the boxes to hide them from you? 2. If the subpoena you sought and received allowed you to review and remove documents, the idea that one or more lawyers prevents you for doing that is crazy.

D: Were the lawyers armed, were they threatening to wrestle you to the ground, or what? How could they possibly prevent you from reviewing or removing documents if you had a lawful subpoena? It doesn’t make sense.

E: You also state that a lawyer represented that you had all classified information. The implication you are trying to create is that you were lied to. So, let me get this straight...

F: A licensed lawyer would put his freedom, career, and law license on the line by intentionally lying to the FBI about classified documents knowing full well that the FBI would eventually find him out?

G: The federal government tracks its classified documents or is supposed to. This entire matter is utterly preposterous. And more so as time goes on.

https://twitter.com/marklevinshow/status/1564978572447604737