Tucker: Biden administration is close to giving WHO power over every intimate aspect of your life

We want to open this evening with a story you may not have heard, but that you should definitely know about. It begins early last year when Joe Biden, in one of his very first acts as president, brought the United States back into the World Health Organization.

We saw this, and we thought: Why would Biden be so anxious to do something like that? At the time, we assumed it was just part of his larger de-orangification effort. Trump had pulled the U.S. out of the World Health Organization, so Biden had to do the opposite. Childish, but that seemed like a fair explanation.

Still, it did seem a little weird because there aren't many international bodies that are more thoroughly discredited than the World Health Organization, particularly after COVID. It's a laughingstock. There's one thing it's not good at, it's public health.

... there will not be a moment ever when the W.H.O. doesn't have operational control over so-called public health matters in this country. Now, what's that going to mean exactly? You've already guessed. It's not really about public health. It never is, but before we tell you what exactly it's going to mean, you should know that none of this is going to be optional.

Thank you for referencing that article Signalman. Please note that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

"Tucker: Biden administration is close to giving WHO power over every intimate aspect of your life"

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

From related thread...

Please consider that there are probably major constitutional problems with the referenced international health treaty imo.

To begin with, the states have never never expressly constitutionally given the post-17th Amendment ratification federal government the specific power to regulate INTRAstate healthcare, not even to stop the spread of disease. (Obamacare, federal CV19 policies are unconstitutional imo.)

"10th Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
"Many are the exercises of power reserved to the States wherein a uniformity of proceeding would be advantageous to all. Such are quarantines, health laws [emphasis added], regulations of the press, banking institutions, training militia, etc., etc." —Thomas Jefferson to James Sullivan, 1807.
"They form a portion of that immense mass of legislation, which embrace every thing in the territory of a state not surrendered to the general government. Inspection laws, quarantine laws, and health laws [emphasis added], as well as laws for regulating the internal commerce of a state, and others, which respect roads, fences, &c. are component parts of state legislation, resulting from the residuary powers of state sovereignty. No direct power over these is given to congress, and consequently they remain subject to state legislation, though they may be controlled by congress, when they interfere with their acknowledged powers." —Justice Joseph Story, Article I, Section 10, Clause 2, 1833.
“Inspection laws, quarantine laws, health laws of every description [emphasis added], as well as laws for regulating the internal commerce of a state and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c., are component parts of this mass.” —Justice Barbour, New York v. Miln., 1837.
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.

Also, Thomas Jefferson and the Supreme Court had also clarified that the federal government cannot use its power to make treaties as a back door to expand its constitutionally limited powers.

“In giving to the President and Senate a power to make treaties, the Constitution meant only to authorize them to carry into effect, by way of treaty, any powers they might constitutionally exercise.” —Thomas Jefferson: The Anas, 1793.
“Surely the President and Senate cannot do by treaty what the whole government is interdicted from doing in any way.” — Thomas Jefferson: Parliamentary Manual, 1812 .
"The obvious and decisive answer to this, of course, is that no agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on the Congress, or on any other branch of Government, which is free from the restraints of the Constitution." —Reid v. Covert, 1957.

Next, not only are we much aware that the 2020 elections were allegedly stolen by desperate elite Democrats, but we now also know that corrupt Congress cannot be expected to police itself under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to get rid of bad-apple, elite lawmakers.

"14th Amendment, Section 3: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof [emphases added]. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."

The fastest remedy for a very corrupt, election year Congress...

The bottom line is that, again, since we'd be fools to expect Congress to enforce Section 3 on itself, Trump's red tsunami of patriots need to do the following. Patriots need to effectively enforce that section by peacefully exercising their voting power to remove desperate Democrats and RINOs from federal and state offices in 2022 midterm elections, replacing them with Trump-endorsed candidates.

So whenever I say that I'm going to "Section 3" federal and state lawmakers in November, y'all will know what I mean.

Insights welcome.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.