To: Steve Van Doorn
The strongest argument against Q today in my opinion. There likely wouldn't have been an election hijack, media censoring or covid. As the left wouldn't have needed to keep doubling down. Okay, so lemme get this straight. Because Trump/Q fought back against the derp takeover, they derps had to keep doubling down which resulted in those things you listed?
You are absolutely correct. All those things were undertaken in order to protect the derps' entrenched power and defend themselves from the Trump/Q attack. But are you seriously saying that we (Trump/Q) should have layed down and just let them mosey into the global takeover without putting up a fuss?
Bro, really?

83 posted on
02/03/2022 8:58:57 PM PST by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: bagster
said, "The strongest argument against Q today in my opinion. There likely wouldn't have been an election hijack, media censoring or covid. As the left wouldn't have needed to keep doubling down"
I will put it a different way.
The strongest argument against Q was we should've taken the blue pill.
if you don't get this one. Sarcasm isn't your forte you racists bigot!
95 posted on
02/04/2022 12:03:56 AM PST by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson