To: Steve Van Doorn
The Q deniers say there is no evidence for the legitimacy (or sincerity of Q); this is the proposed basis for their denial.
Yet they claim “Q was government or military,” in complete absence of evidence.
The incoherence of any argument should always be acknowledged.
104 posted on
02/04/2022 3:26:47 PM PST by
reasonisfaith
(What are the cosmological implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
To: reasonisfaith
said, "Q deniers say there is no evidence for the legitimacy"
Q is anonymous. Anyone that takes anything an anonymous says at face value as fact is an idiot.
Given that. The primary message of Q is philosophical in nature. It's conceptual. Using facts to convey a concept. Primarily that our system is broken.
106 posted on
02/04/2022 4:10:09 PM PST by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson