[Steve Van Doorn]

said, "Could any competent thought process conclude it(2020 election) was not stolen?"

Yes. Depends how you define truth. Proof vs preponderance of evidence.

The cabal is asking for proof they cheated in the election. Anyone that takes the bait can't find proof as cabal has the proof.

Don't take the bait. Preponderance of evidence is enough for any fair court trial that our system is broken. The primary message of Q (humans) is that our system is broken. Which Q believes it can be repaired but it will not be easy.

[reasonisfaith]

If there’s any bait, I’ve disregarded it.

Nothing can possibly depend on how you define truth, because such dependence is itself dependent on variability in truth’s definition.

There is no variability in the definition of truth.

To conclude the 2020 election was not stolen can only be a product of incompetence.