Posted on 11/06/2021 4:26:25 AM PDT by MtnClimber
A reader objected to my last post in which I questioned “vaccinating” children. I’d cited Steve Kirsch in the article, linking his slide deck of facts, which is rich with documentation and live links to sources. The reader counted with a rebuttal from Jeffrey Morris, a Ph.D. from Penn specializing in biostatistics and cancer. From the expansive Kirsch deck, he picked certain statistics to refute, relying on this statistical information to discredit the whole.
Does Morris make cogent points? Who is he? Is he qualified to speak on the subject? His CV shows focused accomplishment within his field. Interestingly, he published a Philadelphia Inquirer article in April 2020, questioning the effects of the lock-down and testing regimen then in use, as being counter-productive and dangerous to society. He had a point; in fact, testing is currently being employed as punishment for the unvaccinated, yet all but ignored for the vaccinated cohort.
Here’s what Morris says about Kirsch’s killed vs. saved claim:
They claim to independently validate these results with another dozen or so alternative “methods”, but these consist of a series of largely unscientific arguments including anecdotal reports (some unverified), opinions elicited from select clinicians who believe the vaccines are inherently dangerous and/or treatment strategies like Ivermectin are the answer, public polls on whether people “know” more people who have died of COVID-19 or vaccines
SBIP
Hmmm…you mean like the deliberately small sample size of cherry-picked test subjects for the study determining whether the vaccine is safe for children? No, I don’t think that’s what Morris was referring to. He probably also wasn’t referring to the fact that they vaccinated the control group in all the vaccine trials as soon as possible afterward, either. That is NOT the way you conduct a trial, as it obviously eliminates all meaningful follow-up.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
They clearly want to get rid of the control group.
Like witnesses in a Clinton investigation..
Like witnesses in a Clinton investigation..
Like witnesses in a Clinton investigation..
Like witnesses in a Clinton investigation..
Like witnesses in a Clinton investigation..
No ideas on the multiple post.
When those in power have lied to you, why would you trust their numbers?
I have seen the CDC lie with statistics for political purposes, for years, in the debate about restricting Second Amendment rights.
The government thinks it owns you.
And as it is..they may not own you but they can definitely control you via restrictions,limitation,lose of various rights under the guise of public safety and the like
When someone signs up for any goverment assistance or actually anyone with ANY connection with the Federal government..is subject to their control.
As we are all witnessing with the greatly exaggerated China Bat Flu 2019-2024.
At this junction much of it is threats.
Like threatening to not allow people access to grocery stores without taking an experimental shot.
I’m the future they may not be as understanding as they are now.
Deep State regards America’s children as just more of Fauci’s beagles.
Sadly, so do some of those childrens’ parents.
This bunch engaged in elder abuse hiding behind an old witness president don't give a damn what the rights of the people are. As a matter of fact they will gut those rights just to piss you off so you can be tagged for retribution for being outspoken. They are making lists folks.
Vaccine mandate compliance today to keep your job, home, and family. Gun violence mandate compliance to keep your job, home, and family tomorrow.
The control group is the uncontrolled group. Now that it's becoming clear that the frankenshot only endows the recipient with ADE, and that with each shot they will become more dependent on the next, the jabbed will be easy to control.
Can't have unvaxxed people walking around and not needing a monthly needle in order to live.
Dr. Peter McCullough said yesterday that Australia has already ordered 14 more boosters for its population.
I’m hoping the U.S. Supreme court is leaning right enough that when one of the hundreds of vaccine mandate lawsuits hit their agenda, they’ll rule it unconstitutional and freedom loving folks everywhere can tell Brandon and these corporate CEO boot lickers to shove it up their @$$.
To me it’s like a big NASA flight. Or 9/11. Or any of our never-won, ongoing wars of the last 75 years. All sorts of agendas get loaded on at once. This is about a lot more than beta testing what you suggest.
Yes, it is all about trust, trusting your ENEMIES. You trust them that they want you dead, in prison, or in a reeducation camp. SO WHEN ALL OF THEM INSIST YOU MUST DO SOMETHING AND THERE CAN BE NO DISCUSSION OR DISENT, YOU RUN LIKE HELL AWAY FROM WHATEVER THEY WANT YOU TO DO.
No need for tons of peer reviewed trials, epidemiology studies, Nobel laureates giving opinions,...
The multiple posts are running rampant this morning for some reason, and are quite annoying.
The weird part is that most of us aren’t anti-vaxxers. We need to see better long-term safety from MRNA technology.
I saw a video sometime ago featuring a leftist comedian turned pundit, Jimmy Dore.
He posted one of his side effects to Twitter and was shut down aa anti-fax.
He reiterated that he took the vaccine and by sharing these issues it will make the vaccines better since they are still experimental. Apparently that made him super anti-fax.
The or mind game on this is crazy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.