What if they are rigging to look like there was fraud perpetrated by the ‘pubbie candidate?
that’s possible but not the way I’ve interpreted the algorithms to work based on 2020 data ... my point being that when the algorithms adjust they re-jigger things in multiple ways, ultimately all going toward the “final solution” being the RATs win, but requires adjusting things in different ways with different strategies. It just happened, in this case, that it was McAwful’s counts that showed up at the time of this adjustment ... and that could be something programmed that way - but that would also suggest they’ve already deployed updates + counter-measures to help obfuscate the way these things have worked in the past, which would be a huge leap from 2020-2021. Bottom line, the percent completed should never be dropping - it means they changed the number available - which is what the algorithms do ... then they figure out if they had this many instead, how should that look while trying to keep the revised counts appearing as “natural” as possible. In 2020 there were always adjustments made to both candidates, but the end result goes to the “final solution”. TBD + WWG1WGA :)