Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage

No tirade. You made some claims about Wood that are not borne out by the facts.

You made some claims about AC parts also not borne out by the facts (at least concerning the Pentagon).

Once I get the book on the detailed history of the 09/11 attacks, we’ll have some more specific evidence to refute your claims about AC parts not being found at the Pentagon.

Have a great day! Or whatever.


310 posted on 10/03/2021 5:18:13 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]


To: Fury

> “ou made some claims about AC parts also not borne out by the facts (at least concerning the Pentagon).”

Oh really?

What I said was that Lin Wood mentioned the Pentagon was hit by a missile and that I knew there were witnesses and affidavits to that claim.

Was I there? No.

All I can do is to repeat what others said and facts that I saw in connection with testimony.

Reports, some linked on FR, of witnesses on the scene as the Pentagon was blown up described a missile, others saying it was a plane but not making sense because the timing was so quick that details describing a plane would be unobtainable. Both planes and missiles can act like missiles but in the split second of approach and impact it would be difficult to say “I saw the plane approach with wing hitting ground” etc. A more plausible eye witness would be “in a about a second I saw a plume, maybe a plane or missile, and then an explosion of the Pentagon building” but such a reasonable report never came to my knowledge. Instead I saw a half dozen testimonies saying they saw the plane, they were nearly hit by the plane, saw wings on the plane, etc. Then I remembered that investigators are trained to take eye witness testimoney with a grain of salt because people see what they want to see, a mugger was 6 ft, no he was 5 ft, he wore a hoodie, no he wore a rain jacket, etc.

Is that me saying that? No.

Five years before TWA 800 was witnessed to have been hit by a missile and the credible witnesses, some were investigators and officials, were at odds over the narrative to explain it. There was CGE that was not credible. Whoever did the CGE claimed the AC turned up vertical and then a cable harness caught fire in the cargo hold eventually blowing up the fuel lines. That was discredited by ‘some’ FAA investigators and reports were they were silenced. The whole thing stunk.

Today, there is not a shred of doubt in my mind that the fake news cartel lie everyday without shame. It is so blatant that when people like Lin Wood make “outrageous” claims, I don’t join those calling his claims outrageous. I know he is a man who is doing the best he can to get the truth out. I don’t take what he says as Gospel but for sure I give him the benefit of the doubt whereas the Marxist Media in today’s so-called News won’t get squat from me. They are disgusting beyond limits.

Here’s a part of the 911 investigation documentary that does I think a good job calling into question whether the camera footage was doctored or not:

2017: 9/11 Pentagon Video FINALLY Reveals Truth About Attack (6 minutes)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18AvDf2NWJU


318 posted on 10/03/2021 7:24:53 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson