Wood referred to the official reports and those reports said no AC remains were found.
All the usual fake news suspects chimed in with reports that AC remains were found but they were never proven.
Wood, as a lawyer can’t follow hearsay. He sticks to official documents.
That’s why he didn’t say DIRECTLY that no planes flew into the Towers.
PA is a different story but Flight 93 never hit a building.
The Pentagon had witnesses that it was a missile and affidavits followed. Affidavits are evidence admissible in a court of law. Doesn’t mean they PROVE anything but they can help corroborate.
Wood is careful to make claims to facts backed by evidence. He can assert other charges based on information and belief. All trial lawyers do that. It’s nothing new. What’s different about Wood is he’s attacking the Deep State and their media morons are dispatched to dirty him up as a result.
“Wood referred to the official reports and those reports said no AC remains were found”
The NPS web site has a page “ FBI Evidence Photographs of the Crash Site - US v. Moussauoi” that states “Evidence photographs of the crash site and debris used during the trial of Zacarias Moussoui. Images were taken during the investgation at the site in September 2001”
https://www.nps.gov/media/photo/gallery.htm?pg=3941191&id=C7A45234-155D-451F-67A019C294E6A905
So the numerous eyewitnesses to the plane hitting the Pentagon are to be disbelieved but we should believe your claim that there are other witnesses who saw a missle? That is some Texas size BS you’re slinging, Slim.