Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather; exnavy

I read on another thread here that they run different tests on vaccinated vs non-vaccinated. Don’t hold me to this I could be wrong or be wrong on specific details but apparently they “cycle” the sample something like no more than 20 times for the vaccinated, but up to 40 times for the unvaccinated. Some suggest that this creates a lot of false positives. I don’t know if that is true but I do know enough to say that using different methods is not “science”, it is not the scientific method at all, and it creates so much statistical bias as to make whatever results unreliable.

And if true, then it would seem to me it is being done intentionally to create biased results. Because the whole purpose of the scientific method is to use a single protocol on every subject, and if you run the same protocol many different times and get the same results each time you get closer and closer to a “proof”. Fauci et al, and anyone who is a doctor or scientist or has a science or statistical mind knows this.


13 posted on 07/17/2021 3:13:28 PM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: monkeyshine

I have a nephew and his wife who are nurses. They have been all around our country, serving. They say the pandemic is “forced”. I ask him to explaine, he smiled and shrugged. I asked him about vaxxing, he replyed don’t bother. It was a short visit at a wedding. we changed the subject.


17 posted on 07/17/2021 3:19:21 PM PDT by exnavy (grow some thick skin, i do not care for whiners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: monkeyshine

They could vary the cycle threshold for any reason altho i have never been asked whether i was vaccinated when tested and then operated on. But i think whoever is administering the test or performing the test can vary the threshold cycle to increase or decrease the case counts. You will never see the cycle threshold along side the case count. Some where in this mess someone I think in florida was requiring the cycle threshold number as part of the test result but i’m sure that was just ignored.


46 posted on 07/17/2021 4:31:25 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: monkeyshine

I saw that too on another thread. Like you I can’t say if it is true.


84 posted on 07/17/2021 10:06:22 PM PDT by CJ Wolf ( what is scarier than offensive words? Not being able to say them...God wins. Trump always wins. . )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: monkeyshine
You are correct. The CDC has scrubbed it. I did save the original as a PDF

Here is a sample.

“COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough case investigation
Information for public health, clinical, and reference laboratories.

Objective
Investigate SARS-CoV-2 infections among people who received COVID-19 vaccine to identify trends or clustering in demographic, the administered vaccine, or the infecting virus

“Respiratory specimen for SARS-CoV-2 sequencing
• Specimen selection
o Clinical specimens for sequencing should have an RT-PCR Ct value ≤28.
o If a Ct value is not available, specimens that are positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen by another testing modality may be sent.”

They basically don't want positive results from vaccinated persons unless the RT-PCR is less than <28

96 posted on 07/18/2021 4:23:42 PM PDT by Polynikes ( Hakkaa paalle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson