Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rdcbn1

It’s more unsubstantiated garbage.


5 posted on 07/06/2021 8:56:27 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: gas_dr

You shouldn’t talk about yourself like that. Jesus loves you.


9 posted on 07/06/2021 9:00:29 PM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gas_dr

...probably.

Unfortunately, most institutions are subverted / corrupted, and the trolls and Chicoms shout “Muh Credentials” even at professionals who deviate from the party line, so who do you ask to do analytical / instrumental analysis on the contents?

Maybe a double blind test with sets of known saline vials and some of these vials.


14 posted on 07/06/2021 9:08:21 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gas_dr

Like your posts!


25 posted on 07/06/2021 9:34:47 PM PDT by vigilante2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gas_dr

If you are a gas Dr you should have access to a rebuttal on this.


35 posted on 07/06/2021 10:15:45 PM PDT by eyedigress (Trump is my President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gas_dr

Ken Donaldson is a respiratory toxicologist at the University of Edinburgh and he and his colleagues are among the first to raise the warning flag on graphene, at least for nanoscopic platelets of the material. It is not too great a leap of the imagination to imagine how such tiny flakes of carbon might be transported deep within the lungs similar to asbestos fibres and coal dust. Once lodged within, there is no likely mechanism for the removal or break down of such inert particles and they might reside on these sensitive tissues triggering a chronic inflammatory response…

https://www.materialstoday.com/carbon/articles/s1369702112701013/


40 posted on 07/06/2021 10:47:46 PM PDT by Flick Lives (“Today we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gas_dr
It’s more unsubstantiated garbage.

Calling something unsubstantiated garbage does make it unsubstantiated garbage.

Better to prove its unsubstantiated garbage.

On a personal note, where you been Gassie? I thought you had retired from vax pimping and seen the light, considering the emerging mountains of never ending evidence that the poison vax is NOT safe OR effective..


50 posted on 07/06/2021 11:52:48 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gas_dr

Prove it


52 posted on 07/07/2021 12:17:16 AM PDT by roving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gas_dr

So it’s the same as covid-19.


68 posted on 07/07/2021 4:00:13 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gas_dr

Yeh everyone but you is an idiot. 😆


78 posted on 07/07/2021 7:06:40 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gas_dr

I tried hunting for Dr Jane Ruby’s educational background but here isn’t even any listed on her own linkedin profile.

She does list 6 yrs spent at the University of Rochester Medical Center; two spent as a Registered Nurse and four as Nurse Practioner.

But there is no indication of where she got her nurse training, and certainly nothing at all about becoming a “doctor”. She could be a “Dr” in the same way that Jill Biden is a “Dr”.

The jobs she reports having are in the field of HEOR, which involves data “for making healthcare coverage and access decisions.”

This isn’t medical research, it’s insurance data analysis concerning the costs of providing various healthcare coverages. HEOR = “Health Economics and Outcomes Research”

Jane Ruby lists 42 publications on her linkedin page, which looks impressive until you notice that 29 of them all concern the opiod buprenorphine. It’s essentially one study. Four of the remainder involve Dupuytren’s Contracture.

What’s missing is Med School, virology, experience in vaccines. In other words Ms Ruby is the perfect candidate to be advising us on the perils of the Pfizer vax as she won’t be hampered by anything resembling knowledge.


193 posted on 07/10/2021 9:31:59 PM PDT by Pelham (No more words, now we fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson