[semimojo]

Try another tactic to defend the fraud.

Of course.

Any FReeper applying the least bit of critical thinking is defending the fraud.

[MHGinTN]

Resorting to the fallacy of the undistributed middle tells me what I wanted to know about you. You can drop your stealth mode now, agitprop.

[bagster]

Any FReeper applying the least bit of critical thinking is defending the fraud.

Haha. Critical thinking!?!?!?!

Just an ounce of 'critical thinking' would have you asking yourself, WHY would this man and Mike Lindell say they had something that proved election fraud if in fact, they didn't.

If they are lying, what would be the ultimate outcome of that? Is it possible that they DO have incriminating cyber evidence? If they do, how did they get it?

And that's just a tiny bit of 'critical thinking' to get the ball rolling.

Yea, critical thinking. You might wanna google that before you open your gaping yap.

[bagster]

Any FReeper applying the least bit of critical thinking is defending the fraud.

p.s. Of course, what you are doing is not 'critical thinking'. Its something else altogether.

And the effect of it is, you are 'defending the fraud'.

#Science