Wait, you provide a link to the actual study to prove the veracity of your “leaked” information claim, but the study is illegitimate because it contradicts the claim you used the same study to support.
You really are an irrational undebatable idiot.
Wait, you provide a link to the actual study to prove the veracity of your “leaked” information claim, but the study is illegitimate because it contradicts the claim you used the same study to support.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I did not say the study is illegitimate. I am saying ‘happy’ interpretations of study data is illegitimate and baseless.
As evidence leaks out, every biased source proclaims there’s no need to worry.
As data reaches the public, we can see many interpretations of the data serve special interests. Objective review can tell us there’s an issue with vaccine particles collecting in the ovaries. We know studies were brief and biased.
There are other studies pointing to this issue which those who are excessively optimistic dismiss out of hand. We can still use the research, but we can use it to investigate further.