Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: precisionshootist
I don't think the criminal democrats have to worry because I believe they marked actual ballots by hand way in advance of the election.

And a recorded forensic audit wouldn't pick up on that? ☺

50 posted on 05/04/2021 12:02:25 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: dragnet2
" I don't think the criminal democrats have to worry because I believe they marked actual ballots by hand way in advance of the election. And a recorded forensic audit wouldn't pick up on that? ☺ "

Not likely if the ballots used were real and they were marked by hand, folded up and put in a box. This is what I think the dems probably did. Outside of examining folds and such how do think auditors are going to be able to tell the difference in a ballot filled out and mailed between another one of tens of thousands filled out by hand by democrat operatives? How is the fraud vote ballot going to look any different than the real voter ballot? The fold issue would be the only way but that seems a bit of a stretch and I think the dems would have folded them.

Now if they have have the supposed envelopes the ballots were mailed in and can canvas the address for authenticity and interview enough voters to get an accurate sample then maybe this will prove fraud. The ballots themselves I think will pass the test even though tens of thousands of them are fraudulent.

I'm hope I'm wrong here but I've been around a long time and I know how commie dems think. They did not use a machine to mark ballots, you can take that to the bank.

57 posted on 05/04/2021 12:20:28 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson