[Seruzawa]

I’m not a vaxxer or an anti-vaxxer. Some vaccines work, like small pox, and some are just fraud, like flu. But A lot of people around me have been vaccinated. A lot come through where I work. A couple of people got sick for a bit. Not one died or was disabled. The problem is that these things occur with any vaccine. Flu vaccines kill people too. Nothing is without risk.

Should we be cautious? Yes. But this guy is full of it.

[ransomnote]

I’m not a vaxxer or an anti-vaxxer. Some vaccines work, like small pox, and some are just fraud, like flu. But A lot of people around me have been vaccinated. A lot come through where I work. A couple of people got sick for a bit. Not one died or was disabled. The problem is that these things occur with any vaccine. Flu vaccines kill people too. Nothing is without risk.

Should we be cautious? Yes. But this guy is full of it.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Because he's a specialist treating Covid-19 patients?

Because he and his team came up with a protocol that cuts death by 85%?

Because he noticed that normally 50 deaths associated in time with vaccination normally gets a vax pulled from the market, and a mere 5 deaths normally gets a warning on television commercials that product may cause death, but we're almost at 4000 deaths following Covid-19 vaccination?

PS: That's just deaths published in VAERS, there are many times unpublished, and more still in real life. 

[absalom01]

Well, this man, Dr. McCullough, is fairly well known by now for his work coming up with therapeutics long before the vaccines were remotely available, which, for some, put him on the “fringe”.

He’s not, and is not anti-vax. Even the whitepaper he published, and which is cited in this blog post states that vaccination is one of the “four pillars” of a pandemic response. He did critique the public health response that downplayed the role of therapeutics, but did not deny that vaccinations are also critical.

What did happen, is someone slapped a grossly misleading headline on a video, and then posted it on an anti-vax blog.

Par for the course at this point.

[dforest]

This is not a traditional vaccine. This is experimental and is not a “vaccine”. The issue with them could arise a few years later, not right after the shot. That alone has damaged and killed people. Down the road? Who knows?

[A strike]

Ok but it is NOT a vaccine.

[tallyhoe]

Should we be cautious? Yes. But this guy is full of it.

Really. Full of it Like Dr. Faulty????