I wrote a thread about vax and stroke data in VAERS. If you want to skip the article and just skim the VAERS data I'll put the direct link here:
(freerepublic.com).CDC VAERS and Covid-19 ‘Vaccines’: Under Reporting Adverse Events, Hiding Stroke Data?
freerepublic.com ^ | 4/25/2021 | vanity
Posted on 4/25/2021, 8:08:42 PM by ransomnote
EXCERPT: There are a total of 2254 'stroke' events reported to VAERS for all vaccines in the database. 886 of them are reports for Covid-19 'vaccines' (approx 5 records are not classified by manufacturer). That's 39% of all published reports of strokes for all vaccines in the VAERS database. And the CDC is far behind in uploading COVID-19 reports to it's database - more than 75% of the reports it received for Covid-19 are not uploaded to the database.
Apologies for not reading your thread on VAERS data regarding strokes following vaccines, but have three questions. If these are addressed i your post just let me know and I will actually read it...
Did you normalize results between vaccines based on number delivered? Your snip of VAERS shows numbers for COVID and zoster, which are shingles vaccines I believe. Seems like a lot more people have got COVID vaccines than shingles, and maybe we should be concerned about the latter...
Is VAERS data confirmed causation or a reporting system to capture all potentially associated events used for potential trend identification and additional follow up (e.g, find a 1 in a million signal that warrants follow up)?
Third question, eh, never mind, was going to ask something about the value of bloggers misrepresenting data sets and statistics as it relates to actually finding answers but realized that was a bit absurd.
Take care.