Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UV scanning at Arizona audit appears to show them using Jovan Pulitzer’s infamous technique
American Conservative ^ | 4/24/2021 | NOQ Report

Posted on 04/24/2021 8:40:56 PM PDT by Beave Meister

The methodology behind the Maricopa election audit has been kept under wraps, but video of the audit appears to show the technique that many had hoped to see.

When inventor Jovan Pulitzer testified in Georgia that he could detect fraudulent ballots by scanning them and running them through a high-tech analysis that included pattern recognition algorithms, many who believe the 2020 election was stolen started calling for this process to be widely applied in audits. But the price tag was high and legal roadblocks have slowed or stopped most attempted forensic audits from happening.

Maricopa County in Arizona is one of the first major audits to be performed. It’s happening right now despite multiple attempts by Democrats to block it. A video from the audit, which can be seen live at AZAudit.org, appears to show Pulitzer’s scan in action, though there has been no confirmation of this.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanconservativemovement.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2020; arizona; audit; az; biden; corruption; election2020; elections; fraud; jovanpulitzer; maricopa; maricopacounty; trump; uv; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last
To: stanne

“Why has no one conceded? This is a waste of my time”

It is a waste of time wondering why no one has conceded since it doesn’t matter at all if a candidate has or hasn’t. It is the Electors who decide who won and the manner the electors are chosen is determined by the state legislatures. A power given to them by the Constitution.


81 posted on 04/25/2021 8:30:12 AM PDT by Armscor38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Armscor38

“It is a waste of time wondering why no one has conceded since it...”

I do not wonder why no one gas conceded. Not for a fraction of a second


82 posted on 04/25/2021 8:34:23 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister; hoosiermama; Jane Long

“Fraud vitiates everything.” That enduring opinion was the crux of the landmark decision handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court in the above referenced case of the United States versus Throckmorton. Ipso facto, the outcome of a POTUS election that is rife with one-sided fraud and criminality is rendered null and void.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61 (1878) United States v. Throckmorton 1.

...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/98/61/

https://www.lawfareblog.com/whats-executive-order-election-interference
On Sept. 12, President Trump signed Executive Order 13848, titled “Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election.” Reporting in early August suggested that such an order was being drafted, though—as will be discussed below—it appears to have changed in some meaningful ways.

The document opens by finding that foreign persons’ “ability … to interfere in or undermine public confidence in [U.S.] elections … constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the [U.S.],” thus triggering the president’s authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), codified at 50 U.S.C. §1701. (For additional background on IEEPA in the sanctions context, see here. For additional background on IEEPA more generally, including surveys of past uses, see here, here and here).
HOW MANY US CITIZENS engaged in this?

[T]he term “foreign interference,” with respect to an election, includes any covert, fraudulent, deceptive, or unlawful actions or attempted actions of a foreign government, or of any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, undertaken with the purpose or effect of influencing, undermining confidence in, or altering the result or reported result of, the election, or undermining public confidence in election processes or institutions …
******************************
***********************************
STARLIT- I’ll finish with this...are the UV lights being used in AZ for making sure ALL ballots are legal? Such as possibly only those that have the watermark WILL BE COUNTED!!! (hoosiermama worked the election here in IN and it was the first time in her 30 to see watermarks. Secretary signs him name with his name printed and his office title. This time they had a muliti-toned watermake...in the area.) She and others examined it with a magnifying glass glass because it was NEW to all who was working there.


83 posted on 04/25/2021 9:03:03 AM PDT by STARLIT (They would not listen, they're not listening still Perhaps they never will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel; stanne

Concession is not in the Constitution and therefore not a part of the process. The electoral votes were counted by Congress, certified, and Biden was inaugurated. The ONLY methods for removing a sitting President are 25th Amendment or impeachment. FRiends, I earnestly it weren’t so, but all I’m preaching is what can be realistically accomplished


84 posted on 04/25/2021 9:05:38 AM PDT by j.havenfarm (20 years on Free Republic, 12/10/20! More than 3700 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/98/61

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914ab52add7b04934732db1

https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep098061/


85 posted on 04/25/2021 9:06:40 AM PDT by STARLIT (They would not listen, they're not listening still Perhaps they never will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: STARLIT; hoosiermama

Praying this is so, and...all tied together....to fully expose the lying, cheating cabal.

Great to see your post!


86 posted on 04/25/2021 9:06:48 AM PDT by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation 🙏🏻🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Thommas

Like it or not the state legislatures certified the election. Yes some states certified fraud, SCOTUS basically if those states are fine with fraud so are we. (I don’t necessarily agree but I see the reasoning.) The solution is in fixing the state legislatures and state judgeships. All legislators & state judges who were fine with fraud or even disinterested in it need to be voted out.

What is going on in Arizona won’t change 2020, it won’t eliminate fraud it will create PR & put it in the ‘Court of Public Opinion’ also it will close off certain avenues for fraud. They’ll have to be more ‘creative’, which means more money spent on it, more complexity added so more ways to get caught if there’s vigilance.


87 posted on 04/25/2021 9:20:28 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
I was only supposing if anything came of the Arizona audit.   I know nothing will.
88 posted on 04/25/2021 9:32:55 AM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

Oh read the original argument and get back to me. Stop wasting my time


89 posted on 04/25/2021 9:51:07 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: stanne

“I do not wonder why no one gas conceded. Not for a fraction of a second”

Then why did you spend time talking about it in post #44?


90 posted on 04/25/2021 10:05:54 AM PDT by Armscor38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Armscor38

Why are you jumping in on a conversation you are. Oy following.


91 posted on 04/25/2021 10:13:36 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: stanne

I’ve done that. You know you’re right. Got me convinced. Throw in a quo warranto writ, application of the Insurrection Act, revelation of secret Executive Orders, and declaration of martial law, and we’re going to be Golden. Sorry for bothering you.


92 posted on 04/25/2021 10:46:39 AM PDT by j.havenfarm (20 years on Free Republic, 12/10/20! More than 3700 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

Hmm. Stand by.


93 posted on 04/25/2021 10:53:28 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

The Supremes will NOT decide if elections should be revisited! They will make a narrow ruling, if taking the case at all, that election fraud occurred or not occurred. What happens thereafter is up to Congress. IMO.


94 posted on 04/25/2021 2:35:19 PM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne

I think your post to me was misdirected since I didn’t reply to this thread.


95 posted on 04/25/2021 9:41:11 PM PDT by Nachoman (Following victory, its best to reload.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson