https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
https://www.nejm.org/
There’s two resources right there. The problem with the general public looking at VAERS is that you aren’t even getting half the story. What the public is seeing in VAERS are simply reports that adverse events took place at some point after a vaccination was given. The investigations that are done after adverse events (such as death) don’t ever update the information in VAERS. So if there are 1,900 reports of death, there’s nothing saying “by the way, all 1,900 were fully investigated and determined to be from natural causes, and this rate is fully in line with expectations and normal rates given the ages of the individuals provided this vaccine”.
If grandma is 102 with a history of heart problems and has a heart attack two weeks after getting a Pfizer vaccine, there’s nothing to tell you that she was 102, had a history of heart problems, and had doctors, nurses, and a medical examiner all in agreement that this was a death from natural causes fully consistent with the patient’s medical history with no sign of any vaccine related problems. So there’s no context to any of the data.
If you want the investigation and the context, you have to look at the published research.
you are sooooooooooooooo confused.
published does not mean it was true.
also, any reports now are premature and underreport
problems. real problems (nanomaterials go to joints,
the cornea, brain, and cause REAL problems), oncogenic,
autoimmune, secondary infections, hyperimmune problems,
endocrine changes, and unanticipated problems
will show up later - they always do.
the ONLY thing that was saved was thousands of mice,
and a smaller cohort that should have been tested first
for these DNA operating systems designed by the CCP
and then copied FROM THE TEXT by the over eager drug
companies.
and your quoting data from a month earlier
by proVAXers is nonsense.