House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff “took the bait” with the Democratic rebuttal to a Republican memo on alleged surveillance abuses by the Justice Department and FBI, according to a former investigator on the panel.
Kash Patel, an attorney who went on to take top national security roles in the Trump administration, told the Epoch Times in an interview last week about his strategy for writing the GOP memo, released in early 2018 over Democratic claims of politicization, that accused officials of misusing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to spy on ex-Trump foreign policy adviser Carter Page as part of the investigation into former President Donald Trump’s potential ties to Russia that started during the 2016 campaign.
“It was game on because we figured out under the rules of the House Intel Committee that there was a way to release classified information if it met certain requirements, and this material met those requirements while safeguarding sources and methods, which we were able to do,” Patel said in an episode of American Thought Leaders. “And so, while we were quietly running that process ... on our side of the investigation, we wanted to make sure that memo was bulletproof. So all we put in the memo were excerpts from people’s under oath interviews and information that we gleaned from the FBI and DOJ’s own documents.”
He added: They were the “only things we put in the Nunes memo because we didn’t want it to be something that we put inflamed rhetoric behind. That’s why it reads kind of bland, but that’s how we set it up.” Patel was referring to Rep. Devin Nunes, who was chairman of the panel at the time. The California Republican is now the ranking member with Democrats in control of the House.
Sorry for length... seemed like every sentence mattered.
Another Q proof
Q#3993
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 878872 No.8952023 Apr 28 2020 18:29:58 (EST) REMEMBER THIS IMPORTANT FACT. ADAM SCHIFF IS PART OF THE 'GANG OF EIGHT' (INTEL). IT WILL BECOME CRITICAL ONCE 'GANG OF EIGHT' MATERIAL IS DECLASSIFIED. LOGICAL Q: IF ADAM SCHIFF 'KNEW' EVERYTHING HE'S INVESTIGATING AND STATING PUBLICLY TO BE KNOWINGLY 'FALSE' [DISINFORMATION] WHY THEN WOULD HE TAKE THE COURSE OF ACTION(S) (ONGOING)? DID ADAM SCHIFF PURPOSELY DECEIVE THE AMERICAN PUBLIC 'THINKING' THE 'GANG OF EIGHT' MATERIAL + OTHER CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTATION WOULD NEVER REACH THE PUBLIC DOMAIN? [AS] memo FALSE. If [AS] was privy to GANG OF EIGHT classified material would he not know the same FACTS (TRUTH) as NUNES? Think NUNES memo v SCHIFF. "Knowingly." What if it was coordinated? Q
Please do not apologize for the length; every sentence should be read, for sure.
Thanks for posting this.