~~~~~~~~~
What scares you is that the whistleblower has provided evidence against your boys, the ones you protect.
Because only a deep stater would challenge conspiracy theories that have amounted to exactly, precisely, absolutely nothing at all.
You are working against the credibility of those trying to bring justice - that behavior doesn't exactly scream "patriot!"
The last four years happened, as did the corruption in the eight years before them.
Okay, so you've changed the subject to distract from your actions.
The 2020 Presidential election was stolen. DiGenova, Giuliani and Powell did not save the day.
More chaff? And it doesn't justify your efforts to discredit those working to hold the Deep State accountable.
There was no seized computer server that had the evidence of fraud on it.
Yes there was.
Tens of thousands of sealed indictments Trump supposedly had ready suddenly disappeared from notice.
No they haven't.

Fake impeachments and prosecutions happened. Hillary was never arrested (Q intel drop #1, by the way).
More chaff from you. You are accountable for your actions tearing down the credibility of those seeking justice no matter how many times you change the subject.
All the promises made by conspiracy theorists pandering to the right have come up empty.
Do you recall the subject we were discussing? You trying to discredit a whistleblower implicating the Deep State in crimes? I don't know who promised you what. What I know is it's not over yet and you won't accept responsibility for tearing down the credibility of those seeking to stop the steal, stop the Deep State. Your actions work to shield traitors and pedophiles.
If Wood gets to court, he has to present evidence and have it cross examined.
Yes. Don't you want him to have his day in court? Are we to have no opportunity to contest the results?
Saying he has it does not count now that the White House is occupied.
Not true - the results can still be contested. If it was too late, why would invest your time in trying to discredit it? Why not let it be heard? We don't have justice yet so we have to keep trying - and here you are insisting it's not worth discussing, there's no point, like we should all give up like you did.
For six months we have been hearing that damning evidence is just about to get released and victory is at hand. The story of the "Boy Who Cried Wolf" and the Peanuts cartoon strips of Lucy and the football keep coming to mind.
So the fight for justice wasn't resolved on your timetable, therefore you "get" to discredit it and portray it as lies and insist it's false? It hasn't happened yet therefore you want to make sure it doesn't and that people stop caring, thinking about it?
If it was useless effort on Lin Woods'/Ryan White's parts, you'd ignore it. But you are trying to discredit it like it's a threat...but a threat to whom?
Don't bother with an answer - it would just be more chaff.
Seth Rich was murdered on July 10, 2016 and MaCauley was murdered on July 8, two days earlier. In his deposition to Lin Wood, White spoke about Seth Rich and was asked on pages 9 and 10 if he knew of any other murders. He did not mention MaCauley. Since these murders were two days apart, if they were related, it is kind of strange that he did not mention her when asked directly.
According to the docket, he was in custody on Apri 22, 2016. I do not have access to the full case file. If he was in custody the entire time until his release, which is likely since this was a federal case, it is unlikely he was talking to either Rich or MaCauley for reasons which should be obvious.
Have you looked at the Leonardo SPA case? It is a case of insider stealing company info, where the defendant is now making claims about the U.S. election, in relation to the Scytl server story. Both the Scytl server and Leonardo SPA case have been dropped by conspiracy theorists when they realized they was nothing to them. Also, this is one more story that is not in his deposition.
White is taking his claims about the U.S. elections, an unsolved murder, and two dead conspiracies and rolling them all together. That he keeps embellishing his story is one more warning sign he is making it up.
If he has so many degrees, where are the records, peer reviewed papers, classmates, teachers, yearbooks, newspapers articles about a child prodigy, etc? Where is your evidence White was framed in 2015, other than his word?
Trying to say the Government made it go away is the same thing Bob Lazar tried in the 1980s, when he claimed the Government was covering up UFOs. He was eventually rejected because schools and employers did not back up the degrees or jobs he claimed he had. Did that make everyone else who denied his claims part of a conspiracy against him?
Look at Joe Arapio and Orly Taitz going after Obama's birth certificate. Regardless of where Obama was born, they did a lousy job of it. When people realized that no matter what the truth was, these two were never to find it, they were gradually ignored and called out. Does saying they did a lousy job and ignoring them make people Obama supporters for it?
What I have seen, is that stories like these tend to grow until two things happen. The closer a cases gets to court, the less conspiracy theorist talk about it since they don't like rules of evidence, cross examination or opposing witnesses. Otherwise, the story gets so preposterous it reaches a peak, then it drops off, then is quietly dropped. Then another tall tale comes along repeating the pattern.
If I think person is a fraud, I will say so and why. If I think were are being taken for fools, I will say so and why. If people do like it, that is their choice.