I don’t remember saying RDW/john was deep state, but I just do not trust him. He makes many claims. I’d like to have some other sources. He says he was framed; I’d like another source. Truthfully, neither you nor I or anyone else with our limited sources can know for sure one way or the other. We each have our opinions on RDW and his info, but that is really all we have. Unless and until there is some verification one way or the other, the actual truth remains to be seen.
We each have our opinions on RDW and his info, but that is really all we have. Unless and until there is some verification one way or the other, the actual truth remains to be seen.
~~~~~~~
Yes. But there’s logic, too. Why publicly accuse people like Brennan, Comey, Hillary, Barack, Justice Roberts, etc. of treason, pedophilia knowing they will try to kill you or take you to court and sue you for defamation? He stated he had a flash drive, reminded them they they always searched for and removed ONE flash drive but not the second, and since then has offered to testify anywhere, anytime. Why make up stories about them, put them on Twitter, tell them to depositions, tell Lin Wood without a reason knowing what the Deep State does to people who report them?
Why would Lin Wood, a defamation lawyer, put forth this information if he thought it was indefensible in court?
So we don’t know for sure - does that mean we should tell people that he’s probably unreliable, lying, taking advantage of people while he’s implicating the Deep State in Deep State crimes? Should we assume and imply the same about Lin Wood as he takes on the deep state? Or should we share the information and let people notice it lines up with information from other sources?
We can share it with whatever caveat (”I haven’t seen the proof he say she has, but here’s what he says”) so those who sacrifice their safety and quality of life to get the truth out may succeed.