Replies

Just pinging a few names who might be interested in Wictor’s take on johnheretohelp’s interview with Lin Wood.

To read Ryan Dark White’s interview with Lin Wood that Wictor is quoting, click the drop box link. Ryan Dark White is johnheretolhelp. Wictor is clearly replying to someone who posted about this interview.

Thomas Wictor @ThomasWic@social.quodverum.com

Thread
For @Aloe_Vera
I’m pretty sure you’re here to discredit conservatives.
All you do is post negativity and conspiracy theories.
THIS—which you posted—is the stupidest thing I’ve ever read.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/fk1qlm0ja2syywm/
https://s3.amazonaws.com/quodverum/media_attachments/files/001/469/853/original/5bb320f2a8849bc9.jpeg

It’s not possible for the FBI to erase the records of somebody’s university degrees and military service.
“Ryan Dark White” would have HIS OWN PAPERWORK to prove that his credentials are real.

When a claim can be debunked in one second, that means it’s false.

Also, this guy makes no sense:

” Because of the undercover nature of many of the investigations I worked on, terrorists or domestic terrorism within the country, they kept me fairly well concealed, and access was limited to a certain group headed by Rod Rosenstein.

“It became known as the “Dirty Trick Squad” in Baltimore. This is where they were using Hammer, Sunrise, Sunset, things like that to illegally spy on people, corrupt—well, attempted to corrupt judges, compromise them—Hillary Clinton, others.”

“I mean, it was just ongoing. They concentrated on judges, but they wanted to concentrate on (inaudible). This was done under the guise of a CISSP operation. It’s a DOJC SIMS computer operation. It was run out of Fort Washington but had a satellite location in Baltimore.”
“And they would illegally compromise people, illegally wiretap, break into computers, plant, reverse, change information, change emails, things of that nature, and it was in this capacity of working with them that information about the judges, Roberts and Pence and things like that have come out.”

What in the name of all that’s holy did he just say?
On paper, it looks like he’s telling Lin Wood that all the accusations made against Pence and Justice Roberts are FALSE, planted by the DOJ in order to compromise the two men.

E-mails were changed, remember?

So how did we make the leap from the FBI compromising people with fake information to the Dirty Tricks Squad revealing REAL e-mails about Pence and Justice Roberts?
This is pure insanity, and it’s STUPID.

You need to work hard on your ability to engage in critical thinking.

When I post my theories, I don’t babble incoherently, and I always provide legislative and constitutional provisions to show plausibility.

More importantly, I ALWAYS ADMIT UP FRONT that it’s just a guess.

This guy is claiming that his childish, deranged fantasy is a FACT.

You need to learn to distinguish between scientific wild-assed guesses (SWAGs) and lies.

If something has zero chance of being true, why post it?
Finally, all you do is bitch about others, but then YOU post garbage that insults the intelligence of everybody who reads it.
Up your game already.
END

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Additional info on Ryan Dark White from me:

I have done searches several times on the name Ryan Dark White and there is very little other than a couple of odd legal things that I have no clue about, links:

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-4th-circuit/1882029.html

RYAN DARK WHITE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ATTORNEY GENERAL ASHCROFT ATTORNEY GENERAL GONZALEZ ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER ATTORNEY GENERAL LYNCH ATTORNEY GENERAL SESSIONS ROD ROSENSTEIN DONNA HANSEN LARRY HOGAN MARTIN MALLEY UNNAMED DEFENDANTS 200

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
RYAN DARK WHITE, Name, as Attorney-In-Fact and representing the whole Class of Plaintiffs, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ATTORNEY GENERAL ASHCROFT; ATTORNEY GENERAL GONZALEZ; ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER; ATTORNEY GENERAL LYNCH; ATTORNEY GENERAL SESSIONS; ROD ROSENSTEIN; DONNA HANSEN, Warden; LARRY HOGAN, Governor of the State of Maryland; MARTIN O’MALLEY, Governor of the State of Maryland; UNNAMED DEFENDANTS, 1-200, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 17-6750
Decided: December 07, 2017
Before DIAZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Ryan Dark White, Appellant Pro Se.
Ryan Dark White appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See White v. United States, No. 1:17-cv-01355-JKB (D. Md. June 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

More here:

https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca4/17-6750

This appears to be the case White was appealing, don’t know what the original felony conviction was.

https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20171127820

U.S. v. WHITE
Email | Print | Comments (0)
Criminal No. JKB-15-0545, Civil No. JKB-17-1710.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

November 13, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
USA, Plaintiff, represented by Peter J. Martinez , Office of the United States Attorney.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES K. BREDAR, Chief District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence / Coram Nobis. (Crim. No 15-545, ECF No. 50.) Defendant pled guilty to being a felon in possession of ammunition on April 22, 2016. (ECF No. 32.) He was sentenced on July 28, 2016, to twenty-seven months in prison and a three-year term of supervised release. (ECF No. 47.) He now complains he received ineffective assistance of counsel and that his proceedings were marked by prosecutorial misconduct. (Mot.)

The Court has reviewed the parties’ various filings (ECF Nos. 60, 62, 63) and the record and finds the Government’s response in opposition persuasive. Defendant does not persuade the Court that his conviction should be vacated. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Government’s response, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s motion (ECF No. 50) IS DENIED.

A certificate of appealability may issue only if the petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). See also Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). In order to satisfy § 2253(c), a petitioner must demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003) (citing Slack, 529 U.S. at 484). Defendant has not met this standard and, consequently, the Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.

The Clerk SHALL SEAL ECF Nos. 62 and 63. The Clerk SHALL SEND a copy of this order to Defendant at the address he provided the Court in ECF No. 55.

SO ORDERED.