I know society is VERY polarized...
but, what gives with FR?
I hate to borrow a term from the left, but it’s like the once every 3-4 day Q threads is a Q “safe space”.
Everywhere else it’s being in the lion’s den. With a vengence, “fellow” FR’ers tear Q folks down. Are we not on the same page, for individual liberty and limited enumerated government?
I know society is VERY polarized...
but, what gives with FR?
I hate to borrow a term from the left, but it’s like the once every 3-4 day Q threads is a Q “safe space”.
Everywhere else it’s being in the lion’s den. With a vengence, “fellow” FR’ers tear Q folks down. Are we not on the same page, for individual liberty and limited enumerated government?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The board owner asks that we keep discussion of Q on the Q threads. If I post about Lin Wood’s released interview with Ryan White, I get attacked for posting on the Q threads. Sometimes on forum threads peeps will say no one should consider what I say valid because I post on Q threads.
I believe this is Digital Brown-shirting. It’s not really directed at those of us known to support Q threads or reference Q content. This is directed at intimidating people who have not stated an interest in Q content. Since I don’t post about Q in the forum, they have to bring the subject up and denounce it, and me to show those on the sidelines how they will be treated if they speak up.
Every few days someone will post a ‘10 minutes of Hate’ type rehearsal of animosity toward Q and those who follow the content, just to remind others that they too will be subject to ridicule and hatred if they are not careful to qualify their statements with, “While I don’t believe Q is real, I do think that....” etc. That’s the ‘safe’ way to comment on content that Q has covered.
Lin Wood’s released transcript is surfacing what Q has said all along - the elites thrive on pedophilia as currency and access to power. That’s why the Digital Brownshirts keep cracking down with anti-Q thread aggression. The truth is coming out and therefore they are trying to stop people from publicly acknowledging it.
“With a vengence, “fellow” FR’ers tear Q folks down.”
Well, when we tried to point out very logically that Q was a fraud, the Q fans called us every name in the book (routinely accusing other FReepers who were critical of Q of being pedophiles, for example). So no, I don’t think there is much goodwill left across that divide.
I think there's general agreement on those goals, but there is major disagreement on whether this "Q" business is helpful or harmful for attaining those goals. Put yourself in the shoes of someone who believes that "Q" is at best some Internet troll having a laugh and at worst a coordinated intelligence effort from the Russians, the Chinese, or the DNC. The people going along with that might have the best of intentions, but the road to Hell is paved with good intentions.
Because Qanon is a total fraud, a cult of brain dead conspiracy theories. FreeRepublic at one point banned similar crap like Alex Jones and Neo-nazis.