Posted on 01/13/2021 9:18:42 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Nice strawman comparing Christian Civilization to what Satanic creeps like Bill Gates truly intend for us.
Tell you what. You go ahead and do what Bill Gates wants you to do.
I will refuse to inject that untested, unproven, and unstable “COVID vaccine” crap into my system.
In ten years, we will see who made the wiser decision.
“Nice strawman comparing Christian Civilization to what Satanic creeps like Bill Gates truly intend for us.”
I’m certainly not doing that.
You do sound crazy in this response.
I don’t like Bill Gates either but I’m not scared he’s going to he me take a vaccine.
He’s much worse than that.
“In ten years, we will see who made the wiser decision.”
I think in ten years it will trivial who took the vaccine vs didn’t.
What do you think it’s going to do to people?
Hmm, looks like others have reached similar conclusions.
The Dr’s appear incorrect in their diagnosis. They called it “acute thrombocytopenic purpura” when it appears to be “chronic thrombocytopenic purpura.”
This is adult onset with idiopathic origin.
Per Johns Hopkins:
In ITP(idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura) the immune system is stimulated to attack your body’s own platelets. Most often this is a result of antibody production against platelets. In a small number of cases, a type of white blood cell called T-cells will directly attack platelets. This immune system error may be a result of any of the following:
Medications (including over-the-counter medications) can cause an allergy that cross-reacts with platelets.
Infections, typically viral infections, including the viruses that cause chicken pox, hepatitis C, and AIDS, can prompt antibodies that cross-react with platelets.
Pregnancy
Immune disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis and lupus
Low-grade lymphomas and leukemias may produce abnormal antibodies against platelet proteins.
Sometimes the cause of immune thrombocytopenic purpura is not known.
**************************************
I have observed similar symptoms in anemic patients.
https://www.aappublications.org/news/2021/01/06/covid19-vaccines-anaphylaxis-010621
Federal health officials have confirmed 29 cases of anaphylaxis after COVID-19 vaccination but are emphasizing the vaccine is safe as millions of doses have been administered.
Anaphylaxis is “still exceedingly rare,” said Nancy Messonnier, M.D., director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “Of course, we all would hope any vaccine would have zero adverse events but … it’s a very safe vaccine.”
Twenty-one of the cases were detailed today in a Morbidity and Mortality Report looking at doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine distributed Dec. 14-23, 2020.
Those cases occurred among nearly 1.9 million doses administered, a rate of 11.1 per 1 million doses. Dr. Messonnier acknowledged the rate is significantly higher than the 1.3 cases per million for flu vaccines but said officials have not detected worrisome safety signalsand are continuing to track and investigate cases.
The median age of the first 21 anaphylaxis cases was 40 years and 90% were female. The average time between vaccination and symptom onset was 13 minutes. Most reactions occurred within 15 minutes. Officials said the doses came from multiple lots of the vaccine, and there was no clustering in any one area of the country.
Seventeen of those who experienced anaphylaxis had a history of allergic reactions to drugs, medical products, food or insect stings. Seven had a history of anaphylaxis.
Four of the patients were hospitalized including three in intensive care. No deaths were reported. Among the 20 with available data, all had been discharged home or recovered, according to the report.
The eight additional cases announced in a press briefing Wednesday that were not part of the study involved both the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, but no additional details were available. No cases of anaphylaxis were reported in the companies’ clinical trials.
The CDC says people should not receive a COVID-19 vaccine if they have a history of severe allergic reaction or an immediate allergic reaction of any severity to a previous dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine or any of its components, including polyethylene glycol. They also should not be vaccinated if they have a history of immediate allergic reaction of any severity to polysorbate.
People with a history of any immediate allergic reaction to any other vaccine or injectable therapy can receive the vaccine but should be counseled about the risks. Those with this history or a history of anaphylaxis due to any cause should be observed for 30 minutes after vaccination. All others should be observed for 15 minutes.
I’ll take the vaccine, if it ever becomes available for mere non-government and non-medical people.
Per the article:
According to Ms. Neckelmann, three days after her husband got the vaccine, he developed tiny reddish spots, or petechiae, caused by bleeding under the skin of his hands and feet. Recognizing the spots as a danger sign, he went to the emergency room. A blood test showed the level of his platelets, a blood component essential for clotting, to be at zero, she wrote, and he was admitted into the intensive care unit with a diagnosis of acute immune thrombocytopenia.
New 9 minute clip. Dr. David Martin explains public health law and how this Pfizer product is NOT a vaccine but a “medical device” and a treatment per legal definitions:
It’s interesting, too, because Dr. Carrie Madej spoke about the patent on Pfizer’s product and how by accepting it, the person is now partially “owned” by Pfizer. Dr. Madej is so obviously caring and warm, expresses her sincere concerns about this mRNA junk and Transhumanism in the 21 minute video at the end of this article (article is good, too):
B-b-b-but the wonderful honest Big Pharma company says his case has nothing to do with their product. I see people learned nothing about the integrity of corporations from the Erin Brockovich story - did they think it was fiction?
I’ve been doing a crash learning course on RNA viruses.
If I understand the new Covid 19 vaccines correctly, they create a synthetic RNA strand similar to an RNA strand of Covid 19.
This synthetic RNA strand acts as a key or antigen to trigger an immune response of t-lymphocytes or memory lymphocytes and b-lymphocytes which attack the synthetic RNA key.
In the old virus vaccine method, a dead virus or weakened strain of the virus is introduced. Macrophage then attack the intruder creating byproduct antigens which the t-lymphocytes and b-lymphocytes multiply and attack to remove from the body.
The concern is that the synthetic keys might unlock other unexpected immune responses causing auto immune diseases such as MS.
MY CONCERN IS THAT THE SYNTHETIC KEYS CAN BE CREATED AS BIOWEAPONS THAT ARE SPECIFIC TARGET GROUPS BASED UPON THEIR GENETIC MAKEUP.
yep military attack.
Well, it’s not nearly as messy as shooting that target group in the back of the head and kicking them into mass graves.
Guess he should have been buying lottery tickets - 1 in 9 million is pretty tough odds to beat.
Did anyone check his platelets before the vaccine?
You are obviously not a scientist, but neither am I - although I have slept in a Holiday In Express from time to time.
I foresee cancer, sterility/infertility related problems, and other similarly serious problems.
Thank you for sharing. I don’t trust any of these creepy people, and it’s good to see this detail you provided.
“I see people learned nothing about the integrity of corporations from the Erin Brockovich story - did they think it was fiction?”
Lol. Yes.
Leftist crap and entertainment Hollywood propaganda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.