RE Can you tell us why we should believe the single-source, CNN-heavy, Dem-backing owner and staff, “debunker?
1) Because they source their data to the PA official website. See here:
https://www.electionreturns.pa.gov/
2) Because the Governor’s office actually announced that 3 million mail-in ballots were sent out A WEEK before November 3. See here:
https://www.governor.pa.gov/newsroom/pennsylvanians-urged-to-hand-deliver-mail-ballots-immediately/
Now, you can tell me that the government of PA is lying, it’s your prerogative. But you’re going to have a hard time convincing a court of law ( yes, even the Supreme Court ) that this is so.
Now, let me turn the question around to you -— You seem to believe the argument that a total of only 1.8 million mail in ballots were sent out and actually 2.5 million ballots were counted. Tell me why you believe this information and not the official PA data.
I await your reasonable answer.
Trump needs all the help he can get and yet he’s now distancing himself from one of his loudest advocates. The closer he gets to SCOTUS, the less he wants any of the lunatic fringe arguments to taint whatever good stuff his team have held back.
We already know some of the more insane voter fraud theories are actually being manufactured by Democrat trolls. But even when that isn’t the case, too many unforced errors have been made.
Example: Daryl Brooks, a black GOP observer who was blocked from observing the Philadelphia count, obviously ticked all the right boxes to Guliani to be wheeled in at short notice for a podium spot at... the Four Seasons, next door to the sex shop. Unfortunate, given he’s a convicted pervert.
At that point in the legal strategy the Four Seasons fiasco was more of an embarrassment than a fatal blow to the SCOTUS action.
But there must be zero tolerance for unforced errors like that from this day on - because if SCOTUS are presented with yet another raft of typo-ridden nonsense and a witness list full of known crazies or convicted felons, or the case draws on a theory that has already been comprehensively debunked, it WILL have a negative influence on the credibility of the rest of the case.
So keep doing what you’re doing, SeekAndFind.
You mean the NeverTrumper Governor Wolf wouldn’t tell another fib?
If They sent out 3 million mal-in ballots a week before Nov 3 in your area, how many do you think would be returned by Nov 3?
Yes, I believe the anti-Trump PA government would lies as much as I believe their anti-Trump “Supreme Court” ignores the law when making its own edicts.
Do you believe that Biden who dropped in every major demographic, and who had next to zero enthusiasm among the base, actually broke all these historic records and that nobody’s lying about how “fair and perfect” the elections are?
After watching video proof of sudden drops in Trump’s counted numbers and huge spikes in Biden’s, and some precincts running 200-800% of total voters in areas, who in their right mind is going to just nod and say, “Well, I believe the ones whose States had some of the largest unexplainable anomalies when they tell me all is right.”
All I’m saying it that, at the very least, one should take any information with a gran of salt and maybe lean toward the data that makes the most sense.
I don’t really care if you consider this a “reasonable answer”, and I don’t expect a response because I’m not convinced you’ve been paying attention.