Replies

I went back in your history some, and you’re pretty much a Debbie Downer with an Eeyore stable.

I don’t have an issue if you come in here with a rational dispute, but you’re not rationally disputing, merely making a blanket statement, based on your preconceived false notions (which is probably mainly buttressed by the false belief that Q “makes predictions”). I know you’ve not spent anything like daily time in here, only enough to hyuck it up with the other clowns that post in here from the main trying to get a rise from thread regulars.

At the barest of minimums you could at least recognize that there are some subjects within the orbit of the Q movement that you would NEVER have heard of in the mainstream had people involved not drug them into the light.

Epstein and NXIVM come to mind at the moment. 10’s of thousands of people would not be drilling through all of the material associated with Dominion corruption.

The social network and media would not have been prodded to actions unveiling their slavish devotion to progressive globalism without this “nonsensical conspiracy theory” you deride so offhandedly. They all seem to take it seriously as a heart attack based on the efforts they make to slander and belittle it and you know perfectly well what taking a lot of FlaK means.

So at the LEAST you could show a little respect, and make some effort at having at LEAST a public face of enthusiasm for winning this mess, or you can stick with the other knobs outside of the thread and leave this one be...