[Salvavida]

Micro evolution is demonstrable. Always has been.

Macro evolution doesn’t exist, and has never existed. That is the problem with Chuck Darwin and his adherents.

[PROCON]

+100¹⁰⁰

[Psalm 73]

Yes, still evolving. And still human - that is all we have ever been: human.

We're also taller than we used to be. Still human.

[BBQToadRibs]

Would you consider this a mutation that’s just been able to sustain itself over generations?

[American in Israel]

Shows the degenerating DNA baseline, the extra artery should be go e, but that part of the code is weak. Extra arteries is not really a good thing as it is a serious failure point if cut. Its purpose is to increase the blood flow when the hand is forming and is un necessary once 5hat is comete

A third eye in the forehead is also of dubious value. But one on the back of the head could be of use. Arguing the forehead eye as evolution is the same, though most would call it a horrible deformity.

[Shark24]

Agree. Let me know when someone grows wings.

[metmom]

Simply more variation within species.

Certainly not creating a new one.

[PeterPrinciple]

Micro evolution is demonstrable. Always has been.

---

As long as this is understood to be gene expression of genetic information already existing.

[bwest]

I disagree—there is a mountain of evidence in support of what you call macro evolution.
And it is entirely consistent with the practice of Christianity.