May have said it here before, but I believe the founders left NBC deliberately vague.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sorry, you are totally inaccurate. It was commonly understood at the time, and up until recent memory, that NBC meant specifically and precisely “born on the soil to two citizen parents”.
It was gone over in more detail on the 0bola research threads than any one would want. Still there on those threads.
Thread by @8Revolt: President @realDonaldTrump just retweeted this. A sign for anons to dig? Who is Alexander McQueen? #QAnon #WWG1WGA Hmm... https://t.co/tD2G1L7yQq… https://t.co/Fad3XqYe7t— FloridaTrumpGirl (@amy67746703) July 4, 2020
Thanks LJ, you kind of proved my point.
For some it’s enough that one citizen parent be an American citizen, while for others it must be both. Or that the child must be born on US soil while others are fine with two citizen parents on foreign soil. So where do we find those boundaries in what the founders wrote. The strictest interpretation is a better measure of security than the weaker position. Since our national security is paramount to ensuring the safety of our citizens and survival of our nation then the strictest interpretation should prevail in a stronger candidate with unquestionable citizenship status as it pertains to running for President.
In Obama’s situation, his weak natural citizenship qualifications were never debated and certainly there were(are) issues with his status that make him less qualified than other candidates on that requirement and he should have been passed over as a candidate. Had the founders stated only one parent should be enough to bestow that natural born citizenship status then that would have allowed that divided allegiance bastard to become president without issue. Clearly the evil that allowed that to happen anyway was not created by the founding fathers.
We certainly want the same thing, I agree with what you are saying as it relates to this constitutional requirement, and I spent many, many, many hours reading and posting in the typically 500+post deliberations on the topic here on FR over Obama and (most recently) with Ted Cruz and Kamala Harris. And, certainly I’m aware of the order of men in the era of the Constitution’s creation where primarily the father was the entity that dictated a family member’s status. On numerous levels Obama was not qualified on just this requirement alone. Perhaps one day soon his Presidency will be reversed and our nation will soon recognize the evil that allowed it to happen in the first place. That’s one of many reasons we are glued to this topic Ransomnote has worked hard to keep alive.