Notice the bait and switch.
The claim is that it is likely the virus escaped from the lab.
The writer switches that to a claim the virus was created in the lab.
This is a huge difference.
this bioweapons connects to
the Pirbright Institute UK
which owns the coronavirus patent,
and who owns the the Institute?
I’ll take Bill and Melinda Gates, Alex.
The answer is right there. In the link above.
There is a poster here doing a similar bait and switch with the chapel hill study
Its bizarre to watch...
Btw..we now know wuhan bat lady was involved with chapel hill study using a different version Of her name in the notes
She studied the same thing in wuhan .she was funded by the US because we cant do those studies here now
And she issued a similar warning as the one that came from Chapel Hill
Yet this poster does a bait and switch.
I am beginning to think that poster has some kind of connection to china or these studies
Something is off about it
lab experiment gone bad. trying to create a vaccine in the lab and a monster got loose.....
Distinction without a difference.
Those are everywhere, but this one actually brought some new terms out in the open, such as RaTG13, which is the near obvious precursor to COVID-19, and exposed the fact it exists in the Wuhan lab (and very likely nowhere else). Also the long section to the Doctor developing a vaccine who carefully explained how labs can modify genes without splicing. This is actually one of the best articles out there IMO, and I’ve read probably close to 100 now. But thanks for your thoughts as well.